Joobo stands for reason, morality, and honesty...and against leftist perversion and dishonesty. Join us as we expose the left for its hatred of everything that is good and its support of everything that is evil.

Sunday, December 31, 2006

American Liberals Mourn Death of Saddam

As we said before, "unless you are a nut, a psycho, a liberal, or a Palestinian, you cheered the news" that Saddam Hussein was hanged.

Here now the American liberals, who mourn the death of a man who, this idjit says, "He was a bully I think."

An overwhelming sense of sadness

I have just read that Saddam Hussein is dead. Hung by the neck until dead – isn’t that the phrase they always use on television? And I feel an overwhelming sense of sadness. Everybody has to start by saying that it isn’t bad that Saddam Hussein is dead – he was an evil man. But what is evil? It is a religious denunciation, a way to set a person apart from humanity. We need to do this I suppose. And if we say that Saddam Hussein is an evil man, don’t we then have to say that other men are good? Who is good I wonder? Where do we find these men of goodness? To say Saddam Hussein was evil is too easy, it lets us off the hook. Saddam Hussein was a cruel man, a selfish man, a desperate man, a sad man.

He was a bully I think. He was a man who never knew happiness I think. He rationalized his actions I’m sure by saying that he did what had to be done. He called his own enemies evil, and tortured them completely. Saddam Hussein was all too human. He walked among us. In this moment of spiritual limbo between Christmas and the start of a new year I feel an overwhelming sense of sadness.

I feel sadness because we repaid cruelty with cruelty. We did it because we allowed an emotionally disturbed man to lead us, to direct our actions. We destroyed Saddam Hussein’s life. This was perhaps justified. Do we destroy every cruel man’s life? Is it our duty to destroy every cruel man’s life? Still, it was not less than he deserved. Take away his livelihood. What will we do to the war profiteers who had a hand in murdering our own children for a few dollars? Will we be as angry, as cruel?

We killed his children while he was still alive. We hunted them down like animals and slaughtered them without dignity. As a father I will say no human deserves this. Once we have reached this level of cruelty it has gone beyond repayment. It has become something visceral, something deep within our souls that we usually try to hide, even from ourselves. But we felt no shame. We celebrated this cruelty, cheered it and broadcast it to the world. Who gave us this lisence I wonder? Now that this Pandora's box is open, will we be able to close it?

We destroyed Saddam Hussein’s history. We went in to his village, his tribe, and we wiped away the footsteps of his lineage. We made sure that Saddam Hussein knows that everything about him, who he was, where he came from has ended.

Oh, no more of this.

Remember, folks: these are the loons you voted in November to control the US Congress.


Palestinians Mourn Saddam: "We Lost a Leader"

Saddam Hussein is dead, and unless you are a nut, a psycho, a liberal, or a Palestinian, you cheered the news.

The subhuman Palestinians are sad, upset, disgusted, that the fellow Muslim asshole who funded their terrorist ways has bit the dust, and now is in the same perverted hell their former leader, Yassir Arafat, is sitting in.

Palestinians on Saddam: We lost a leader

Many in the Palestinian Authority on Saturday lamented the execution of Saddam Hussein, who received a special status among the Palestinians.

"Saddam was known for his ability to stick to his opinion and say 'no' to a world power," said Husni al-Ajal, 46, from a refugee camp near Ramallah.

The pictures of the "butcher from Baghdad" were hung in many places in the West Bank and Gaza. Some of the pictures featured both Saddam Hussein and former PA Chairman Yasser Arafat.


A Hamas spokesman Fauzi Barhoum, condemned the execution, which he referred to as "a political assassination.

Mushir al-Masri, a Hamas lawmaker, added that "this is proof of the United States' criminal and terrorist policy in its war against the forces of resistance in the world."

PA residents reminisced over the Gulf War, when dozens of Scud missiles were launched at Israel. The missiles, which landed in the center of the country in 1991, were accompanied by celebrations and chants: "Saddam, strike Tel Aviv."

The Iraqi president remained popular among the Palestinians also during the recent intifada, when he promised to transfer USD 25,000 to families of Palestinians killed in terror attacks and clashes with Israel.

Sabha Muhammad, 57, of Jenin, received USD 25,000 from Saddam to rebuild her house, which was destroyed during Operation Defense Shield.

"I cried when I heard the news. I felt that we, as Arabs and Muslims, lost a strong leader today. I wish all Arab and Muslim leaders a similar fate, as they did not stand by Saddam – starting from the American occupation, through the president's seizure, to his killing."

This is definitely a people who deserve a state of their own.

American Muslims Want the Terrorists to Win in Somalia

In Somalia right now, the psychotic "Union of Islamic Courts," which took power and then pushed a radical, Taliban regime (people were executed for watching movies and not praying five times a day), has been tossed out by the UN-backed secular government, aided by Ethiopian forces, which were trained by American troops in Africa.

This has the fruitpie Muslims up in arms - after all, why are we not helping the Muslim crackheads who want to kill those who are not fellow Muslim crackheads?

1,000 Muslims "demonstrated" in Minneapolis over this. This is the crap we have let into this country.

Area Somalis want peace for homeland

More than a thousand Somalis gathered in Minneapolis on Saturday to call for Ethiopian troops to withdraw immediately from Somalia.

Their protest capped a week in which transitional government troops retook Mogadishu, Somalia's capital, with the backing of Ethiopian infantrymen.

The U.S. government "gave the green light" to Ethiopia to work in concert with the transitional federal government in Somalia, and that action was "totally wrong," said Hassan Mohamud.

He is the president of the Somali Institute for Peace and Justice in Minneapolis, which organized Saturday's rally.

"We ask the president of the United States, Mr. Bush, and his administration to stop supporting the terrorists. Ethiopian troops are terrorists," Mohamud said to a cheering crowd.

Yep, getting rid of psychotic Muslims is now "supporting the terrorists."

Of course, if you read further, you find delusion after delusion from these nutbags.

Somali men, women and children gathered Saturday morning in Peavey Park in Minneapolis, and they carried an array of signs. Some said "No more war" and "Islam is the solution."

Lt. Rick Thomas of the Minneapolis Police Department estimated the crowd at about 1,500 people for a rally that ran for more than two hours.

Mohamud said he and other Somalis want the United States to support talks that can yield "peace and reconciliation."

Somalia has not had a stable government in 15 years, but many attendees at the rally said that the Union of Islamic Courts (UIC) had brought some peace to the country during the past six months.

When that Islamic group took over the capital in June, many people were optimistic about the future, said Omar Jamal, executive director of the Somali Justice Advocacy Center in Minneapolis.

"They brought back security," Jamal said in a telephone interview. "We were all hoping that the moderates would be able to take the lead in the organization of the UIC. But unfortunately, the radicals hijacked the process."

Islam is the solution, all right - to the end of the world.

Saturday, December 30, 2006

John Conyers "Accepts" That He Violated the Law

Here is what happens when liberals run things: John Conyers, the blackjob who is next week to become chairman of the House Judiciary Committee (and who would give his life to be able to hold impeachment hearings on President Bush), has "accepted" that he violated House ethics rules by employing office staff in illegal ways.

What will happen to Conyers now that he has "accepted" the findings of the House Ethics Committee? Will he be punished? Will he be thrown off the Judiciary Committee?

Of course not. Because, in Liberalland, where only Republicans get nailed for being crooks, Conyers has "accepted" the findings and now "promises" to change.

That's it. He will not do it anymore.

Slap on hand, please up tempo.

Conyers accepts responsibility for possible ethics violations

Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) has "accepted responsibility" for possibly violating House rules by requiring his official staff to perform campaign-related work, according to a statement quietly released by the House ethics committee late Friday evening.

The top Republican and Democratic members on the ethics panel, Reps. Doc Hastings (R-Wash.) and Howard Berman (D-Calif.), said in a statement that Conyers acknowledged a "lack of clarity" in communicating what was expected of his official staff and that he accepted responsibility for his actions.

"[Conyers] agreed to take a number of additional, significant steps to ensure that his office complies with all rules and standards regarding campaign and
personal work by congressional staff," they stated. "We have concluded that this matter should be resolved through the issuance of this public statement."

There you have it. The man has been found to have broken ethics rules, but him agreeing not to do it again ends the investigation.

If anyone says that Downies are serious about ending "the culture of corruption" (or that their media buddies are serious about reporting about Downies and their corruption), this should put to rest those concerns.

Friday, December 29, 2006

Declassified State Department Memo: Arafat Behind Murders of Two US Diplomats

Yasir Arafat, the scum-sucking Palestinian terrorist who led his subhuman population in a campaign of violence against the world, was hailed as some saint by the likes of Bill Clinton and others who wanted to deal with him. When George W. Bush refused to meet with him, it was Bush who was criticized by the usual suspects in the pro-Palestinian crowd. What no one knew - but suspected - was that the US government concluded that Arafat personally ordered the murders of Ambassador Cleo Noel and his deputy George Moore in 1973. The evidence comes in a memo declassified this week by the State Department.

[document in PDF form]


In the early evening hours of 1 March 1973, eight Black
September Organization (BSO) terrorists seized the Saudi Arabian
Embassy in Khartoum as a diplomatic reception honoring
the departing United States Deputy Chief of Mission (DCM) was
ending. After slightly wounding the United States Ambassador
and the Belgian Charge d'Affaires, the terrorists took these
officials plus the United States DCM, the Saudi Arabian Ambassador
and the Jordanian Charge d'Affaires hostage. In return
for the freedom of the hostages, the captors demanded the release
of various individuals, mostly Palestinian guerrillas,
imprisoned in Jordan, Israel and the United States.

The Khartoum operation was planned and carried out with
the full knowledge and personal approval of Yasir Arafat,
Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), and
the head of Fatah.
Fatah representatives based in Khartoum
participated in the attack, using a Fatah vehicle to transport
the terrorists to the Saudi Arabian Embassy.

The United States should have grabbed Arafat, indicted him, and had him executed. Instead, we shook his hand, gave him millions of dollars, and backed him with our country's good name, while he was ordering the deaths of 2 American diplomats and thousands of innocent Israelis.

Shame on those who knew of this and covered it up. Shame.

Thursday, December 28, 2006

Muslims Call for Lawsuits to "Fight Abuse of Islam"

The Muslims of the world, when not blowing innocent people up and just making life generally rotten and shitty for everyone involved with them, feel that any comments on their behavior is an "abuse of Islam" - and now they demand a system around the world allowing Muslims to file lawsuits to end this "abuse."

The Muslims continue to get funny and tragic at the same time.

MWL Wants Lawsuits for Abuse of Islam and the Prophet

A two-day conference organized by the Makkah-based Muslim World League yesterday called for a consultative commission in order to take legal action against those who abuse Islam and its Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and Islamic sanctities, at local and international courts of justice, the Saudi Press Agency said.

The conference titled “In Defense of the Prophet” called upon Islamic countries and governments to stand united to defend the Islamic faith and its Prophet. It denounced the smear campaigns to tarnish the image of the Prophet and urged Muslims to make all-out efforts to project the true picture of Islam and the great divine teachings of the Prophet.

Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul Aziz Al-Asheikh, who presided over the conference, called upon Muslims to follow the Prophet’s teachings.

“Our enemies are exploiting Muslims’ weak adherence to the Prophet’s Sunnah,” said Al-Asheikh. “We should not be ashamed of implementing his Sunnah. On the other hand, all Muslims must observe his teachings in all walks of their life.”

If this wasn't at all funny to you, check out this quote, which should crack up, and at the same time frighten, the world:

Jamal Badawi, a Canadian-Muslim expert on Islam, spoke about the Prophet’s outstanding influence on human history.

“There is no other personality who has made such a positive impact on history,” he told the conference.

Yep, that Muhammad has made such a positive influence on the world. All of the innocents killed by Islamic terrorism for the past 40 years would agree, we are sure.

Wednesday, December 27, 2006

Liberal Newspaper Sold...for Less Than Half of What it was Worth!

In 1998, the McClatchy Company bought the Minneapolis Star-Tribune for $1.2 billion and turned it into a slobbering leftwing rag. Its circulation plummeted, and, this week, the paper was sold to a private equity firm, for $530 million.

Understand this: McClatchy turned a paper worth $1.2 billion in 1998 to one worth less than half, $530 million, 8 short years later.

Now that's what we call "liberal economics."

Equity Firm Buys Paper in Minnesota

In an unexpected move, the McClatchy Company, the newspaper publisher, said yesterday that it was selling The Star Tribune of Minneapolis to a private equity firm, Avista Capital Partners, for $530 million, citing the lagging performance of the paper and the tax advantages from the sale.

McClatchy said in a statement that the sale of the newspaper, which it bought for $1.2 billion in 1998, would help reduce its debt after the purchase of the Knight Ridder chain for more than $4 billion.

If this had been a conservative operation, the major news outlets and the MSM in America would be laughing. But when liberals reduce the value of their own properties by half, it is considered back page news.

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

NY Sun: Courts Side with Bush Administration on Wiretaps; Liberals Seeth With Rage

Despite having the NYT and other disgusting media expose the warrantless wiretaps which are keeping this nation safe from Islamic terrorists, and the outrage from liberals, the federal courts have held, 17-1, that the program is constitutional.

Take that, liberal fuckers.

Courts Side With NSA On Wiretaps

Defense lawyers who had hoped that the public disclosure a year ago of the National Security Agency's wiretapping program would yield information favorable to their clients are being rebuffed by the federal judiciary, which in a series of unusually consistent rulings has rejected efforts by terrorism suspects to access the records.

In at least 17 criminal cases, federal district judges nominated to the federal bench by presidents Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Clinton, and George W. Bush have ruled against requests to force the government to tell defendants, most accused of terrorism-related crimes, whether the NSA eavesdropped on them without a court warrant.

The rulings indicate that even as public support for the war in Iraq has eroded in polls and as the NSA program has come under criticism from congressional Democrats, and even some Republicans, federal judges may be a bulwark that the Bush administration can rely on to defer to at least some aspects of its wartime policies.

Notice that even Clinton judges have upheld the wiretaps.

The liberals in the media and everywhere else must seeth with burning hatred of George W. Bush defending this country.

Monday, December 25, 2006

A Blogger Asks, "What has Barack Obama Done," and The NY Times Answers: "He Voted for Condoleezza Rice"

We asked here what Senator Barack Obama has done in his 2 short years in the US Senate to warrant people calling for his election as President. It looks like the liberals do not like to hear this question: when blogger Mickey Kaus, no conservative, asked, The NY Times came back with a hilarious answer: He voted for Condoleezza Rice for Secretary of State.

Wow! Now THAT is a record that should vault him into the White House!

First, Kaus' question:

More Obama Substance!

1) Has Obama grappled seriously and smartly with the big questions of the day; and

2) Has he, in the course of this grappling, told Dems something they don't want to hear, or demonstrated independence from Dem interest groups that enforce the party's line in unfortunate ways (e.g., teacher's unions impeding education reform, seniors unwilling to accept any Social Security cuts, populists who pretend bargaining-down drug prices will largely solve the problem of health-care costs, etc.).

The answer from the Times? Hold your breath for full-on liberal lunacy:

Testing the Water, Obama Tests His Own Limits

He has demonstrated an occasional willingness to break from liberal orthodoxy, including his vote to confirm Condoleezza Rice as secretary of state, which at the time infuriated liberals (13 Democrats opposed her). He formed alliances with Republicans on a handful of noncontroversial issues, including wasteful government spending in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

That is some record.

But, the Times says in the next paragraph: "Hey! Nothing to see here!"

But his potential candidacy is as much about who he is as about his legislative record.

You see, it is all about who Bananarama is. His lack of a record, or the fact that he is wholly not ready to be a US Senator, much less President, is not relevant.

Move on, says the dumbkopfs at The Times. If we want Osama Barama as the next President, we will get him, his record be damned.

Sunday, December 24, 2006

That Palestinian Civil War Gets Closer and Closer and Closer and Closer...

The news media in America just does not want to tell you that those peaceful Palestinians* are at each other's throats, and full-scale civil war is about to hit the areas they control.

While everyone worries about Christmas shopping, the Pallies are shooting at each other.

The good things about this are two-fold: one, the Pallies can kill each other off for all we care, and, two, this keeps them from bombing Israelis.

Attack on home of Palestinian foreign minister

After a few hours of calm in Gaza, the quiet was disturbed as armed gunmen fired shots on the home of Palestinian Foreign Minister Mahmoud al-Zahar, one of Hamas' leaders. The shots were fired at his home, and there were no reports of injuries. It is also unclear whether the minister was at the house during the attack.

Palestinain sources said that the attack was perpetrated by members of the Dharmesh family, one of the largest families in Gaze. Two of the family's sons were killed last week, most likely by Hamas gunmen. The sources said that the attack came as a reminder from the family to the Hamas leadership, after they have set an ultimatum for the faction to hand over the killers of their sons.

Last week, as Hamas and Fatah forces clashed in Gaza, two members of the Dharmesh family were killed. One of the sons, Mahmoud, was a bodyguard for Samir Masharawi, a senior Fatah official in the Gaza Strip.

The family and the Fatah movement accused elements within the armed wing of Hamas and the special security force of the Palestinian government of involvement in the murder. The family members have already set ablaze several vehicles belonging to the Hamas special security force and threatened that if the killers are not handed to them, they will take the law into their hands and avenge the killing of their sons.

Note to Israel: Stand back, and watch as the Pallies kill each other off.

*Yeah, right.

Saturday, December 23, 2006

Leftwing Lunatics Find Things in Common Terrorist!

The raving whackjobs at "Daily Kos" have found things in common with the al-Qaeda number 2, Ayman al-Zawahiri.

Check out this posting and see the reverence, the respect, shown to this mass murderer.

Zawahari speaks to Americans: Democrats and Republicans mentioned in speech

This diary corrects a misconception being spread by the MSM today regarding the speech of al-Zawahari. It is quickly becoming a story that can be summed up as: Al-Qaeda's number two man has written a note to the Democratic party about November.

Well, that is only partially true.

Dr. al-Zawahari does speak to the Democrats in his speech; however, what is incontrovertible is that when the transcript of the speech is read in full, we find there is more to the speech, al-Zawahari also addressed the Republicans, and all Americans generally.

This latter fact is conveniently unmentioned both in Drudge's screaming headline: AL QAEDA MESSAGE TO DEMS: WE BEAT GOP IN NOVEMBER and by Brian Ross and Hoda Osman's piece that Drudge links, titled: Al Qaeda Sends a Message to Democrats.

Now, the question becomes why did ABC News and Drudge not cover the entire story? Why did they highlight the Democratic mention and neglect the Republican mention? What is their motivation for telling only half a story, when the entire story is more powerful and less political?

I can say that I have never found the translations of statements made by individuals unfriendly to the positions of the Bush Administration to be accurately represented in the MSM. Today, offers yet another example of the manipulation of public statements made by these individuals, for political purposes.

Of course, we need to make sure that this psychopath is called "Dr."

The left has only dirty words and hatred for President Bush. For the man who helped to engineer the deaths of 3,000 Americans, they have respect.

Don't believe it? Check out the comments section below this nut's rants:

I really can say with complete certainty I don't give a tinkers damn why they hate us. They killed our fellow citizens if you forget.

Some of us are less compassionate then you obviously when it comes to our enemies.

by AmericanBlitzkrieg on Fri Dec 22, 2006 at 03:57:42 PM PST

Who precisely did 'they' kill?

Best Wishes, Demena

by Demena on Fri Dec 22, 2006 at 04:04:46 PM PST

Abour 3,000 New Yorkers?

Or did the Mossad plan 9\11...

by AmericanBlitzkrieg on Fri Dec 22, 2006 at 04:06:23 PM PST

So a few criminals cause a semi-major disaster that kills 3000 people and the response from the USA is to kill 650,000 innocent Iraqis - and you don't care.

And you wonder why it happened. You don't care about 'why' they hate you.

Umm... You are the damn cause of the problem.

Now the left says that 9/11 was no big deal.

And this is what controls Congress now. Yikes.

Friday, December 22, 2006

Alan Hevesi: Downie Crook Forced to Resign

When Mark Foley was forced to resign from the US House for being a pervert, the MSM had lengthy programs on about another pol caught in the crooked net.

Alan Hevesi, NY State Comptroller, was also caught - except he is a real crook.


We have discussed Hevesi before - this past June when he said that President Bush should have a bullet aimed at his head - for which Hevesi should have been arrested, and an October story pinpointing his corrupt use of state funds and employees for his own personal use. Now that the mid-term elections have safely passed, Hevesi will resign and plead guilty to misdemeanors.

NY's Hevesi to resign after pleading guilty: judge

ALBANY (Reuters) - New York state Comptroller Alan Hevesi will resign January 1 after pleading guilty to a felony charge of defrauding the government, Albany County judge Stephen Herrick said on Friday.

The guilty plea stems from a criminal probe by Albany County District Attorney P. David Soares into Hevesi's use of state workers to chauffeur his wife and his failure to immediately reimburse the state.

Herrick said the sentencing is scheduled for February 9 and Hevesi could face up to four years in prison and a $5,000 fine.

Now, imagine if this had come out before the election.

Of course, we will never know - because the MSM covered it up.

Thursday, December 21, 2006

Leftwing Fruitcake Aims to Replace Cindy Sheehan as "Piece of Shit Mom"

The American media, aiming to see how far they can push their anti-American garbage, are aiming to find a replacement for Cindy Sheehan, the "Piece of Shit Mom," because even they realize that Sheehan is a crooked joke who has become a comedy routine and not a real protest vehicle.

To this end, the media needs to get a new scumbag, er, protestor, to be the "voice of conscience" against the war in Iraq. So, America, get to know the name of "Rosemarie Jackowski," as this 69 year old lunatic is now a "peace activist," reports the MSM.

Unfortunately, the record says otherwise.

First, a look at Rosemarie the Loon.

Vt. Woman Is an Unlikely Peace Activist

Meet the anti-war movement's newest folk hero: 69-year-old Rosemarie Jackowski, whose arrest during an anti-war protest has made her a cause celebre.

A prosecutor's plan to retry her for blocking traffic while protesting the Iraq war is turning the feisty 4-foot-10 inch former schoolteacher into a darling of the dove crowd.

Bloggers have rallied behind her, peace activists are deluging her with messages of support, and advocates have established a defense fund.

"She's not a loony toon by any means," said Andrew Schoerke, 73, a retired U.S. Navy captain who was arrested with her. "She's a very down to earth, sensible, caring person with some very strong convictions."

Jackowski was one of a dozen protesters arrested at a March 20, 2003 protest, staged within hours of the start of the United States' "shock and awe" bombing campaign in Iraq. Carrying a sign that read "Impeach Bush" on one side and listed U.S. "war crimes" on the other, Jackowski refused police orders to get out of the street and was arrested for blocking traffic.

"It was really hard for me to stand there and just hold my sign," she said in an interview. "I came from a strict ethnic, religious background. I was taught to never ever be disobedient to anyone _ teacher, parent, policeman. That was my very first act of disobedience to anyone."

So, to sum up the information just handed to you:

A woman with no record of protest suddenly decided to protest that her country went to war. Now she is being persecuted! Damn!

Now, a look at the "real" Rosemarie Jackowski: She is a committed Socialist (not a "socialist," but an actual member of the American Socialist Party), and she is a nut as well.

Another Cindy Sheehan! Wow!

Socialist National Committee's Campaign Clearinghouse

Attorney General: Rosemarie Jackowski for Attorney General

How nice, eh?

Now, plug the name of this leftwing psycho into a search engine, and see what pops up:

Reparations for Iran

Vermont Vets Support Ward Churchill Statement

There’s Got to be a Better Way to Run a Country

New Rules for Liberals

From Hiroshima to Fallujah: The Slaughter of Civilians Continues

And that is just some of the evil crap this obviously deluded woman has written.

This is not some sudden peace activist - she is a committed socialist nutcase. And for the media to label her as some Johnny-come-lately, some innocent grandmother pushed by conscience to protest her country, is a bald-faced lie and should be condemned.

Wednesday, December 20, 2006

BBC: The Palestinian "Tit for Tat Violence" is now "Anarchy"

The BBC is so afraid to say that those peaceful Palestinians are in the midst of a full-blown civil war that they will twist themselves to use every word but "civil war" in their stories on the oncoming Palestinian civil war.

This week's word? "Anarchy."


Schools shut amid Gaza 'anarchy'

Schools have been closed in Gaza amid what officials say is a state of anarchy caused by fighting between Palestinian factions Hamas and Fatah.

The education ministry acted after several children were among those hurt in a day of clashes that killed three.

Violence has flared since Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas on Saturday called for new elections, a move the Hamas-led government branded a "coup".

Mr Abbas has called for all factions to respect a truce agreed on Sunday.

In a statement, he called on "all, without exception, to adhere to a ceasefire and to end the killings and all other operations in order to maintain our national unity".

Yep - it is a state of "anarchy." There is "fighting." There is a "coup."

But a civil war, which it is? Nada!

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

British Lord Demands Resignation of two US Senate Boneheads

Readers of this column will note that when Republicans act like assholes we call them on it - we do not just bash the left, although that is where 90% of the mischief in America comes from.

To this end, we present the demand from Lord Monckton, Viscount Brenchley, who has demanded that US Senators Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and Olympia Snowe (R-ME) resign after they told ExxonMobil to stop funding research into the fraud of "global warming."

Now, we are not 100% with a foreign politician calling for the heads of any US politician. But Lord Monckton is correct - who are these two imbeciles to call for a corporation to do research which is legal? Especially when it shows what a fraudulent issue "global warming" truly is.

Rockefeller and Snowe should be condemned by the US Senate for trying to stifle free speech. They are boneheads, both of them.

British Lord Stings Senators Rockefeller and Snowe: 'Uphold Free Speech or Resign'

Lord Monckton, Viscount of Brenchley, has sent an open letter to Senators Rockefeller (D-WV) and Snowe (R-Maine) in response to their recent open letter telling the CEO of ExxonMobil to cease funding climate-skeptic scientists. (

Lord Monckton, former policy adviser to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, writes: "You defy every tenet of democracy when you invite ExxonMobil to deny itself the right to provide information to 'senior elected and appointed government officials' who disagree with your opinion."

In what The Charleston (WV) Daily Mail has called "an intemperate attempt to squelch debate with a hint of political consequences," Senators Rockefeller and Snowe released an open letter dated October 30 to ExxonMobil CEO, Rex Tillerson, insisting he end Exxon's funding of a "climate change denial campaign." The Senators labeled scientists with whom they disagree as "deniers," a term usually directed at "Holocaust deniers." Some voices on the political left have called for the arrest and prosecution of skeptical scientists. The British Foreign Secretary has said skeptics should be treated like advocates of Islamic terror and must be denied access to the media.

Responds Lord Monckton, "Sceptics and those who have the courage to support them are actually helpful in getting the science right. They do not, as you improperly suggest, 'obfuscate' the issue: they assist in clarifying it by challenging weaknesses in the 'consensus' argument and they compel necessary corrections ... "

Cheers to Lord Monckton. And boos to the American media, which not only lies about the causes of alleged global warming, but refuses to condemn a blatant attempt to stifle free speech.

Monday, December 18, 2006

John Ford: Downie Crook

The Downies love to point to Republican corruption, yet they and the media have a problem mentioning when their own people are caught with their hands in the cookie jar.

Case in point: John Ford, Tennessee Downie and father of defeated US Senate candidate Harold Ford, is back in the hot seat again, indicted on charges of mixing business and pleasure while he sat in the Tennessee state Legislature.

Media reaction? None - because only Republican corruption matters...or didn't you know that?

New federal charges target John Ford faces over consulting deals

NASHVILLE, Tenn. - Former state Sen. John Ford, already awaiting trial in the Tennessee Waltz public corruption case, has been indicted on new charges over consulting deals he had with state contractors while he was in the Legislature, federal prosecutors announced Monday.

Ford is accused of taking more than $800,000 in consultant payments from two contractors with TennCare, the state's expanded Medicare program, while using his position as a state senator to promote those contractors' interests.

That includes helping a dental contractor, Doral Tennessee, win a bid to become the sole provider of managed care dental services for TennCare.

While being paid as a consultant Ford also served on three committees with authority over TennCare. He chaired the Senate General Welfare Committee and was a member of the TennCare Oversight Committee and the Senate Finance Committee.

Now, if Ford were a black Republican, Keith Dimbulbermann and the rest of the sickening leftwing MSM in America would be doing special reports about the "Republican culture of corruption." But with a "D" after his name comes silence.

Sunday, December 17, 2006

John Kerry: Meeting with Those Uneducated People in Iraq

John Kerry, formerly Presidential candidate and present-day loon, has gone to Iraq and met with American troops there.

Read this entire story - and notice that not one word on the troops' reaction to Kerry, or words to him, are mentioned.

Any "fuck you, Senator" or "drop dead, you asshole" from the men to Johnny Boy?

Kerry: Iraq visit helped focus his views

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Sen. John Kerry said meeting with American and British troops in Iraq on Saturday helped clear his thoughts about what needs to be done to stabilize the country and he looked forward to hearing ideas from Iraqis.

Kerry, the Democratic nominee for president in 2004 and possibly a future contender, conferred Saturday with U.S. and British officers in the southern city of Basra and with American troops in Diyala province during a nine-day Middle East tour.

"Today was very informative and very helpful in crystallizing some of my thoughts insofar as what we can negotiate ... and what needs to be accomplished," Kerry told The Associated Press by telephone.

Notice that the morons who wrote this article mentioned that Kerry was a presidential candidate, but neglected to state that he called those troops in Iraq uneducated.

The American media: leaving pertinent information out of their biased stories since who knows when.

Saturday, December 16, 2006

OMIGOD! YOU ARE THE PERSON OF THE YEAR! (Or, am I the Person of the Year?)

Time Magazine, known for their ridiculous choices for "Person" (formerly Man) of the Year (like naming Earth "Planet of the Year," edging out Mercury and Venus in a close call), has named YOU (me?) as "Person of the Year."

Holy fucking this awful or what?

Time Magazine's Person of the Year: You

Congratulations! You are the Time magazine "Person of the Year."

The annual honor for 2006 went to each and every one of us, as Time cited the shift from institutions to individuals - citizens of the new digital democracy, as the magazine put it. The winners this year were anyone using or creating content on the World Wide Web.

"If you choose an individual, you have to justify how that person affected millions of people," said Richard Stengel, who took over as Time's managing editor earlier this year. "But if you choose millions of people, you don't have to justify it to anyone."

It looks like Time magazine has not only jumped the shark, but has made itself into a complete laughingstock.

Ain't that wonderful?

Friday, December 15, 2006

Jimmy Carter: First a Racist, Now a Liar, Too

Toilet pervert and failed one-termer Jimmy Carter, the racist anti-Semitic former President, met with some rabbis while in Phoenix on his "I Hate Jews" book tour.

Jimmah told The NY Times that the rabbis hugged him and told him how right he was about Israel. Unfortunately for Jimmah, that's not how the rabbis see it.

First, the story...packed full of lies:

Carter Book Stirs Furor With Its View of Israelis’ ‘Apartheid’

On Tuesday night in Phoenix, after signings and interviews to promote his new book, “Palestine Peace Not Apartheid,” President Jimmy Carter made a hastily arranged visit: an hourlong gathering with a group of rabbis.

“We ended up holding hands and circled in prayer,” Mr. Carter said in a telephone interview from Phoenix, adding that the rabbis requested the meeting to discuss his book.

Now, for the rabbis' reaction (4th letter down):

Carter, ‘Apartheid’ and the Mideast (4 Letters)

To the Editor:

The executive committee of the Board of Rabbis of Greater Phoenix met with Jimmy Carter for more than an hour, not to “discuss” his book, as you report he said, but to speak on behalf of the greater Phoenix Jewish community and share with him the very serious concerns we have regarding his book.

Mr. Carter referred to our praying together. In essence, it was a closing invocation for peace in the world but was not intended and should not be construed as representing any agreement or conciliation by us with Mr. Carter’s position.

In fact, the opposite is true.

His use of the word “colonization” to describe Israel’s policies in the West Bank, without any consideration for the security concerns of the Israeli government, shows his bias on the issue.

(Rabbi) Darren Kleinberg
Phoenix, Dec. 14, 2006

Jimmah Carter...racist, thuggish, anti-American and anti-Semitic. Now he is a liar as well.

Thursday, December 14, 2006

Palestinians Move Closer to Civil War...and Where is the American Media? On Mount Hood!

When there is a violent act in Iraq, the American media (minus Fox News) launches on a major story showing that civil war has hit Iraq. When there is a violent act amongst the peaceful Palestinians, the American media shows an update on the 3 climbers on Mount Hood.

Well, there is more violence - and the Pallies are moving closer to full-on civil war.

Prominent Hamas member gunned down in Gaza as unrest grows

KHAN YUNIS, Gaza Strip (AFP) - A prominent member of the Palestinian ruling movement Hamas was gunned down in the Gaza Strip, stoking internecine tensions ahead of an eagerly awaited address by president Mahmud Abbas on how to end a spiraling political crisis.

Bassam al-Farra, 28, was driving to work in the southern town of Khan Yunis when he was ambushed by men in another vehicle, security sources said.

He was a judge at the Beni Suheila court in Khan Yunis and also served as local commander of Hamas's armed wing, the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades.

The group pointed the finger of blame for the shooting at Abbas's Fatah party and vowed revenge.

"A death squadron composed of suspected elements of the preventive security force and Fatah" was behind the shooting, a statement said.

Stand back for more fun news from the peaceful Palestinians!

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Breaking News: "Federal Whistleblower" Stewart Webb to Sue Clintons, Bushes

If you read the leftwing websites long enough, you see not serious news pieces or opinion, but psychopathic messages designed to massage the leftist ego. A year ago, it was "Bush, Cheney Indicted!" Despite the fact that this never happened, the site that ran that shit,, still has the false story on their website.

So, checking back as to their newer hallucinations, we find that "federal whistleblower" (or just blower) Stewart Webb (who this is remains a state secret) is suing "Bush-Clinton shadow government partner Leonard Millman" under the RICO statute.

Who is "Leonard Millman"? Apparently, he is Stewart Webb's former father-in-law, who convinced his daughter that Webb was some sicko, and she ran with their daughter, whom a court took away from Webb.

So, we have a nut whose wife left him suing his father-in-law...and he includes President Bush and former President Bill Clinton in the suit. Which judge will laugh at this one?

Whistleblower launches legal fund for imminent suit against Bush-Clinton officials

Kansas City, MO—November 19, 2006—Long-time federal whistleblower Stewart Webb sounded like his time had finally arrived now that he is surrounded by a coterie of seasoned attorneys, active and retired federal agency witnesses and others unnamed to protect their safety who will help him take on what he called a corrupt and criminal administration whose key players were recruited from the Reagan-Bush 41 administrations.

The former home builder and realtor told that he will soon file suit in U.S. District Court against top-level Bush-Clinton shadow government partner Leonard Millman and several Justice Department officials linked to others more senior in government under the Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organization (RICO) and False Claims Act for obstruction of justice, violations of parental rights, forgery, perjury and slander, among other criminal acts.

Just before the 1992 election Webb’s elderly parents suffered through his illegal imprisonment for ten months by Bush 41 and Clinton administration officials seeking to insure that the whistleblower would be unable to expose what he knew and what other illegally incarcerated agents told him regarding a shadow government operation referred to collectively by political prisoners as “the Bush-Clinton crime family.”

With the help of agency witnesses and his legal team, Webb will also attempt to be reunited with his daughter who he has not seen in 22 years after she was taken from him by a corrupt judicial system—but not before he introduces proof and evidence into federal court via a legal complaint encompassing the fraudulent theft of trillions from the United States Treasury, blackmail of House and Senate members, murders, narcotics trafficking, a variety of financial frauds and obstruction of justice related to all of the foregoing.

So, this fruitpie alleges that Bush and Clinton jailed his parents? Who are his parents? Who cares!

We eagerly await an update to this (not) important story, and the results of this hilarious lawsuit.

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Global Warming: The Horseshit Never Ends

Every day, the likes of the American media, or the BBC, or some numbnuts environmentalists, all tell us that the world is ending because of "global warming," but if somehow we stopped all human activity save breathing, we could still stop it.

But, alas alack! The UN, that worthless body of crap, actually made the mistake of telling the truth for once, and said the unsayable: that global warming is not as bad as the screamers have been saying.


UN downgrades man's impact on the climate

Mankind has had less effect on global warming than previously supposed, a United Nations report on climate change will claim next year.

The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says there can be little doubt that humans are responsible for warming the planet, but the organisation has reduced its overall estimate of this effect by 25 per cent.

In a final draft of its fourth assessment report, to be published in February, the panel reports that the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has accelerated in the past five years. It also predicts that temperatures will rise by up to 4.5 C during the next 100 years, bringing more frequent heat waves and storms.

The panel, however, has lowered predictions of how much sea levels will rise in comparison with its last report in 2001.

Worse yet, the UN has discovered that humans have no link to hurricanes and other storms.

No firm link yet between human-caused global warming and intensity of cyclones – UN

12 December 2006 – Despite a recent increase in dangerous typhoons and hurricanes, no firm link can yet be drawn between human-induced climate change and variations in intensity and frequency of tropical cyclones, the United Nations World Meteorological Organization (WMO) has reported, citing a consensus of 125 leading researchers and forecasters.

The recent increase in loss of life and damages from tropical cyclones has largely been caused by rising concentrations of population and infrastructure in coastal regions, WMO said in a news release summarizing the results of its 6th international workshop on tropical cyclones held in Costa Rica last month.

Although the accuracy of tropical cyclone monitoring has improved considerably over the last few decades, large regional variations exist in methods used to monitor tropical cyclones, and several regions have no measurements by specialized aircraft. These factors continue to make detection of trends difficult, it added.

Then again, another study discovered that cows are responsible.

"Guff" is what The Scotsman calls it. "Shit," "crap," and "baloney" is what we call it.

It's official: global warming is guff

AT LAST, evidence that global warming is a load of hot air. Cow flatulence has attracted the attention of ministers after emerging as an environmental menace to rival factory chimneys, Chelsea tractors and cheap air travel.

Bovine emissions account for around one million tonnes of methane a year in the UK and now the government wants farmers to change what they feed the animals to cut down greenhouse gases.

Incredible! The news can't get much better, can it?

Well, according to the imbeciles at the BBC, this is all nothing. Global warming is worse than ever, and, yes, if you stop breathing it will all go away.

Arctic sea ice 'faces rapid melt'

The Arctic may be close to a tipping point that sees all-year-round ice disappear very rapidly in the next few decades, US scientists have warned.

The latest data presented at the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting suggests the ice is no longer showing a robust recovery from the summer melt.

Well, that's it. No more ice, no more cold, no more Earth.

We are doomed...unless the BBC is just normally full of shit.

More on the Oncoming Palestinian Civil War

A bit of good news, finally, from the subhuman Palestinians: they are now turning on each other and killing each other in the streets.

And, to haunt the Pallies even more, the words "civil war" are starting to creep into the coverage of these happy, peaceful people.*

That is definitely an ominous development.

Protests erupt over boys' deaths in Gaza

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip - Demonstrations erupted throughout the West Bank and Gaza Strip on Tuesday in a mass outpouring of grief and fury a day after the killing of an intelligence officer's three young sons. Students stayed home from school, newspapers published angry editorials and mothers outside the president's office demanded protection for their children.

As tensions rose, Hamas gunmen opened fire on a group of demonstrators who blamed the militant Islamic group for the slayings. The escalating violence dimmed hopes for a unity government and peace talks with Israel — raising the specter of civil war instead.

You have to hand it to the Palestinians. Either they are blowing up Israeli children on buses, having grandmothers do their fighting for them, or shooting demonstrators in the streets.

*Yeah, right.

Monday, December 11, 2006

Who is Barack Obama - And Why is the American Media in Love with Him?

The American media loves liberals - especially liberals they feel they can push headlong into the White House. Wally Mondull, Jimmah Carter, Bill Clinton, Mike Dukakis, Al Gore, John Kerry - a long line of doofus liberals the media foisted on the rest of us.

2 years before the 2008 election, the media sees the potential of Hillary Clinton going down to defeat as a really bad sign - after all, the media reasons, they cannot help get the nomination for someone who will lose the election. We fucked up in 2004 by helping John Kerry! We won't do that again! Not another Republican in 2008! We will fix that!

To that end, the liberals have searched for that "special" politician who has no record worth speaking about (like John Edwards), is a good enough liar (like Al Gore), and can manipulate the people with sweeping statements (like Bill Clinton).

Who fits this bill this time around? Barack Hussein Obama, that's who.

Now, who is Barack Obama, whom fellow Downcaster Ted Kennedy called "Osama Barama, Barama Orama, Barack Osama"? He is a man with 2 years experience in the US Senate, with not one accomplishment to his name. Yet, somehow, the American media is swooning over him. "He's the next President!" says this outlet. "He is such a wonderful speaker!" says another. What has he done? The media won't say. They don't want to sink the Obama ship and help Hillary Clinton get the Downcaster nomination.

Check out this piece from October by American bonehead Richard Cohen - who is so in love with the idea of President Obama that he gives up all pretenses of neutrality:

Why Not Obama?

And yet I cheer his announcement that he might announce he is going to announce -- something like that. I say this not just because I have been following his career out of the corner of my eye -- my, my, ain't he a natural! -- but actually reading his speeches. The one he gave on the role of religion in politics was as smart a speech as I've ever read. It's the sort of thing John F. Kennedy could have given, only his would have been written by someone else, probably Ted Sorensen.

I cheer also because Obama is an African-American -- an African father, an American mother. For someone like him to be a presidential candidate -- maybe even president -- says oodles about this country. After eight years of George W. Bush and his narcissistic foreign policy -- me, me, us, us -- it would be great to have a president who presents a different message just by his complexion and compensates, if anything can, for how Iraq (Abu Ghraib, etc.) has tarnished America's reputation, particularly in the Third World. Obama's candidacy would not be just a photo-op, it would be historic.

But mostly I want Obama to run because he would come into the race with no baggage on Iraq. Not from him would we hear excuses about how he was misled by the Bush administration into thinking there were weapons of mass destruction there. Obama not only was against the war when he ran for the Senate, but he can claim -- as could the 21 Democratic senators who voted against the war resolution -- that it was possible to accept the "facts'' at the time and still see that the war was unnecessary, if not downright stupid. It just makes me wince every time I hear John Kerry or John Edwards or Joe Biden or Chris Dodd or Hillary Clinton say they were misled, fooled, lied to or some other version of seduced or abandoned -- otherwise they would have voted the right way. This is disingenuous.

There is that deadly combination of white guilt and liberal "ain't he grand" bullshit rearing its ugly head. Cohen should complete the exercise and demand to unzip Obama's fly and suck his cock.

The question comes back to this: What has this man done to merit a potential presidential run?

Larry Kudlow looks at the record. And the answer is: nothing. Nothing at all.

The Audacity of Hype

Behind the Obama story is a very liberal left voting record. Here are some key votes and positions from Obama:

· Voted against extending the Bush tax cuts on capital gains and dividends.

· Voted against permanently repealing the Death Tax. (Called the cuts a "Paris Hilton" tax break for "billionaire heirs and heiresses") · Voted against CAFTA.

· Voted YES on raising the minimum wage to $7.25 rather than $6.25.

· Opposed the lifting of $0.54 per gallon tariff on cheaper Brazillian ethanol. Said, "ethanol imports are neither necessary nor a practical response to current gasoline prices."

· Voted against the bankruptcy abuse bill.

· Opposes privatizing Social Security

· Voted against drilling in ANWR.

· Voted against confirmation of Sam Alito AND John Roberts as chief justice.

· Voted against extending the PATRIOT Act's wiretap provision.

· Opposed any bans on partial birth abortions.

Tell the people in any poll the positions of "candidate A" and then tell them they are the positions of Osama Barama. Then watch as Banamarama Osama's fortunes sink faster than the Lusitania.

But the American media won't do that. It could harm their goal of getting a Downie into the White House in 2008.

Iraq is a Civil War, the Palestinians are "a Sectarian Incident"

The American media, in full defeat mode on Iraq, is more than happy to tell the dolts watching them that each death in Iraq is part of that country's "civil war." How so? When one Muslim kills another in Iraq, it is a civil war.

Continuing other violence, the Palestinians are fighting amongst themselves - and killing themselves. Today a car with 3 children in it was fired upon, killing all 3. One group of Palestinians killing another group of Palestinians - what is that? A civil war? Of course not, says the US media. They label this "a sectarian incident."


3 Palestinian kids dead in Gaza drive-by

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip - Gunmen killed the three young sons of a Palestinian security officer targeted twice before for assassination by Hamas, riddling the car taking them to school with more than 60 bullets — and raising the specter of open war between Fatah and the Islamic group.

Intelligence officials accused the ruling Hamas Party of being behind the drive-by shooting, unprecedented in its brutality even for violence-wracked Gaza. The officer had helped crack down on Hamas a decade ago and was twice before targeted by assassins, but was not in the car with his children Monday morning.

At the funeral, mourners held aloft the small bodies of the boys wrapped in white burial shrouds. "I have no words. Words stop at the extent of this crime," said the bereaved father, Baha Balousheh. "I am a father who has lost his children."

Even more hilarious, the BBC, that friend of the Palestinians, calls this "tit for tat violence."

Yep, those tits are in full machine gun mode.

Outrage over killing of Gaza boys

The attack comes amid growing tension between the rival Palestinian factions, Hamas and Fatah.

It is bound to inflame the situation, the BBC's Middle East analyst Roger Hardy says.

The clear danger is that political differences will lead to an escalation of tit-for-tat violence, he says.

We eagerly await the first American media outlet calling the fighting amongst Palestinians as "bordering on civil war." But we will not hold our breath.

Sunday, December 10, 2006

William Jefferson, Thief, Gets Re-elected

When Republicans are crooks, the media likes to tell you how the party fosters a "culture of corruption" in Washington. It sounds so good, so clear - so important to getting a Downie majority in Congress.

When Downies are crooked, it is either an unfounded allegation, or is because of right-wing conspiracies. And Nancy Pelosi (D-Nutbag) is no where to be found when her own party's members are caught with their hands in the cookie jar.

Example: Rep. William Jefferson, who ranks as one of the worst criminal offenders in DC. Running for re-election, even the liberal media wrote him off.

Not his constituents. They remain stupid, as they actually re-elected him. Overwhelmingly.

Jefferson swarms back to win re-election

Confounding political pundits and a slew of rivals who had become confident of his defeat, U.S. Rep. William Jefferson, D-New Orleans, neatly sidestepped a roiling federal corruption probe to win re-election on Saturday to his ninth term in Congress.

Guilty pleas by aides and associates who admitted to bribing the congressman and the revelation in court documents that FBI agents had found $90,000 in marked bills stuffed into Jefferson's freezer had put the scent of blood in political waters.

A field of a dozen candidates began circling Jefferson in the primary. He
finished first, but with only 30 percent of the vote, inspiring conjecture that his performance amounted to repudiation of an incumbent and that he would surely lose the runoff against state Rep. Karen Carter, D-New Orleans.

Instead, Jefferson, 59, scored a dramatic upset by racking up huge pluralities in African African-dominated precincts in Orleans, and winning outright in Jefferson Parish, where Sheriff Harry Lee had spent his campaign.

If Jefferson was a Republican, and had been re-elected to a Republican majority, you can bet that reporters would ask the majority leader and his party what their reaction is. Can we all assume that the liberal media could care less what Nancy Pelosi thinks of this situation?

Saturday, December 09, 2006

The Osama, uh, Obama, uh, Barama, uh, Bananarama, Crusade, is OVER

Imagine this one: the Downercrats have the dumb belief that they can nominate a man with less experience in the US Senate than John Edwards, with the name Barack Obama, and get away with it.

Why not? Because the liberals at DummiesUnderground have let the cat out of the bag: Obama's middle name is Hussein.

That's right, folks. His name is Barack Hussein Obama.

Here's the Downie commercial for 2008: Elect our candidate, despite the fact that he has the name of one of our sworn enemies, and his last name sounds like the name of the guy who committed 9/11.

Imagine the faces of ordinary Americans when they hear this one.

Barack Hussein Obama on the ticket = disaster for Democrats

Just imagine the 6:30 national news in the fall of 2008. They start with a story about terrorism in the Middle East. They show clips of 9-11 and mention Osama and Saddam Hussein. Then they move to the election and mention Barack Hussein Obama.

It makes no difference what we think here on DU. The GDAV (generally dumb American voters) will not vote for a ticket with that name on it. We will get slaughtered. End of message.

Can the party of John Kerry and Dennis Kucinich get any stupider? And the American people voted to put these anuses in power?

Friday, December 08, 2006

Man Arrested in Potential Illinois Terror Plot...But Why was He Arrested?

A man has been arrested in Illinois after planning to blow up a mall near Christmas with hand grenades.

But, for some unknown reason, information on the religion of the defendant is missing.

Can you help us out to discover what religion the man is?

Suspect Arrested In Alleged Illinois Terror Plot

A 22-year-old Rockford man with an ambition to become a terrorist has been arrested by federal authorities on allegations that he planned to set off grenades in garbage cans in a mall in Rockford.

Derrick Shareef, of Rockford, was arrested on Wednesday by FBI agents from the Chicago Joint Terrorism Task Force, the U.S. Attorney's office said.

He was arraigned on the charges early Friday afternoon before U.S. Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez.

Shareef was apprehended after meeting with an undercover agent in a Rockford store parking lot to trade a set of stereo speaksers for four hand grenades and a handgun, the U.S. Attorney's office said.

Fascinating...simply fascinating!

However, we still do not know what religion this man is!

Let's read about the blurb on the side of the story?

Law enforcement officials say the man was a U.S. citizen, and planned to commit some sort of terrorist attack in Chicago. The man had "ideas and desires, but no means," law enforcement sources said.

So, he was an "American citizen"! Of what religion, please?

Of course, the politically-correct story does not use the words that they should:

The man is a Muslim. He is an American Muslim.

Mall bomb suspect's mother shocked at his arrest

Even before federal agents said they foiled his terrorism plot, Derrick Shareef's growing commitment to radical Islam worried his mother.

Marie Dunn didn't like the traditional Muslim clothing her 22-year-old son began wearing. She expressed concerns about the people with whom he had become involved.

“He just started dressing to the extreme,” she said.

The garb made Dunn uncomfortable in part because she worried it would single out her family. As one of the few black families in homogenous Genoa, she says they didn't need another reason to call attention to themselves.

The family, however, now finds itself at the center of a national news story after Shareef's arrest earlier this week. Federal prosecutors have accused him of plotting a grenade-driven terrorist attack on a busy Rockford mall during the holiday season.

Even though his mother believes he did not mean to hurt anyone, she was disturbed by his move to "radical Islam." Sorry, lady, but that is Islam, not radical Islam.

If this thug were a Christian, a Jew, or a Buddhist, he would not be planning to attack people in a mall with grenades. But since he is a Muslim, a piece of information important to the story, the PC media sees no reason to tell you that.

After all, Muslims have such a wonderful track record in dealing with human beings they do not like.

Thursday, December 07, 2006

More Muslim Thuggery: Pray Five Times a Day or the Government Will Kill You

It has become painfully clear to all but the stupidest liberal (which is a redundancy) that Muslims want to rule the world and make others become Muslim or be killed. To this end, they also demand that all Muslims do as they are told. So, from Somalia, we have the government telling Muslims that they must pray five times a day - or they will be killed.

What a sweet religion Islam is turning out to be. Sweet and peaceful.

Somalia official issues beheading threat

MOGADISHU, Somalia - Residents of a southern Somalia town who do not pray five times a day will be beheaded, an Islamic courts official said Wednesday, adding the edict will be implemented in three days.

Public places such as shops and tea houses in Bulo Burto, about 124 miles northeast of the capital, Mogadishu, should be closed during prayer time and no one should be on the streets, said Sheik Hussein Barre Rage, the chairman of the town's Islamic court.

Those who do not follow this edict "will definitely be beheaded according to Islamic law," Rage told The Associated Press by phone. "As Muslims, we should practice Islam fully, not in part, and that is what our religion enjoins us to do."

He said that the courts are announcing the edict over loudspeakers in the town.

The decision is not binding on courts in other towns.

Message to non-Muslims: Hold on to your head, because here come the psychopaths. And the liberals side with them over America.

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

Jimmah Carter Book Riddled With Errors, Lies, Fraud: Says Friend

Imagine if a former Republican President wrote a book that a long-time friend said was riddled with lies, half-truths, distortions, and outright would have the likes of the Keith Dimbulbermanns and Wolf Blintzes leading their hilarious programs with this groundbreaking story, showcasing the friend as a good person who blew the whistle on a liar.

Now switch the story, and have the book writer be a former Downer President, and his friend and head of his center blow the whistle. Are the liberals interested? Of course not - because according to their sick minds, their kind doesn't lie.

Toilet pervert and failed one-term presidential loser Jimmy Carter wrote a book, part of his diatribes against the state of Israel, along the lines of his bigoted and anti-Semitic rants, and the head of the Carter Center in Atlanta for the past 12 years says the book is complete horseshit...yet only Fox was interested.

How interesting. Michael Richards uses the "n-word" and gets national coverage, but a former President, perhaps the worst we have ever had, writes a book of lies and Jew hatred, and yet the nation's media could care less.

Errors, omissions, inventions and falsehoods

A reader writes that he received the email message below sent by Professor Kenneth Stein of Emory University and the Carter Center. Professor Stein's expertise lies in the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict.


This note is to inform you that yesterday, I sent letters to President Jimmy Carter, Emory University President Jim Wagner, and Dr. John Hardman, Executive Director of the Carter Center resigning my position, effectively immediately, as Middle East Fellow of the Carter Center of Emory University. This ends my 23 year association with an institution that in some small way I helped shape and develop. My joint academic position in Emory College in the History and Political Science Departments, and, as Director of the Emory Institute for the Study of Modern Israel remains unchanged.

Many still believe that I have an active association with the Center and, act as an adviser to President Carter, neither is the case. President Carter has intermittently continued to come to the Arab-Israeli Conflict class I teach in Emory College. He gives undergraduate students a fine first hand recollection of the Begin-Sadat negotiations of the late 1970s. Since I left the Center physically thirteen years ago, the Middle East program of the Center has waned as has my status as a Carter Center Fellow. For the record, I had nothing to do with the research, preparation, writing, or review of President Carter's recent publication. Any material which he used from the book we did together in 1984, The Blood of Abraham, he used unilaterally.

President Carter's book on the Middle East, a title too inflammatory to even print, is not based on unvarnished analyses; it is replete with factual errors, copied materials not cited, superficialities, glaring omissions, and simply invented segments. Aside from the one-sided nature of the book, meant to provoke, there are recollections cited from meetings where I was the third person in the room, and my notes of those meetings show little similarity to points claimed in the book. Being a former President does not give one a unique privilege to invent information or to unpack it with cuts, deftly slanted to provide a particular outlook. Having little access to Arabic and Hebrew sources, I believe, clearly handicapped his understanding and analyses of how history has unfolded over the last decade. Falsehoods, if repeated often enough become meta-truths, and they then can become the erroneous baseline for shaping and reinforcing attitudes and for policy-making. The history and interpretation of the Arab-Israeli conflict is already drowning in half-truths, suppositions, and self-serving myths; more are not necessary. In due course, I shall detail these points and reflect on their origins.

The decade I spent at the Carter Center (1983-1993) as the first permanent Executive Director and as the first Fellow were intellectually enriching for Emory as an institution, the general public, the interns who learned with us, and for me professionally. Setting standards for rigorous interchange and careful analyses spilled out to the other programs that shaped the Center's early years. There was mutual respect for all views; we carefully avoided polemics or special pleading. This book does not hold to those standards. My continued association with the Center leaves the impression that I am sanctioning a series of egregious errors and polemical conclusions which appeared in President Carter's book. I can not allow that impression to stand.

Through Emory College, I have continued my professional commitment to inform students and the general public about the history and politics of Israel, the Middle East, and American policies toward the region. I have tried to remain true to a life-time devotion to scholarly excellence based upon unvarnished analyses and intellectual integrity. I hold fast to the notion that academic settings and those in positions of influence must teach and not preach. Through Emory College, in public lectures, and in OPED writings, I have adhered to the strong belief that history must presented in context, and understood the way it was, not the way we wish it to be.

In closing, let me thank you for your friendship, past and continuing support for ISMI, and to Emory College. Let me also wish you and your loved ones a happy holiday season, and a healthy and productive new year.

As ever,

Dr. Kenneth W. Stein,
Professor of Contemporary Middle Eastern History, Political Science,
and Israeli Studies,
Director, Middle East Research Program and
Emory Institute for the Study of Modern Israel
Atlanta, Georgia

Jimmah exposed. A liar exposed. By a friend.

Jimmah Carter was a horrible President. He has been a racist and bigot and anti-American thug for 26 years since leaving office. Now he is a liar and plagiarist, too.

And the American media, run by liberals for liberals, could care less.

Monday, December 04, 2006

The Downercrats and their Old Motto: "Do as We Say, Not as We Do"

For months before the midterm elections, the Downercrats bitched about every conceivable subject, claiming that if somehow they could win control of Congress things would change for the better. Taxes? Raised! The war in Iraq? Ended! The 9/11 Commission's recommendations? We will implement all of them, the Downercrats yelled. Elect us - and watch what we do!

Well, they have been elected, and, as proven by their past track record, the Downercrats apparently (shock of shocks) merely wanted control of Congress so they could be in the majority. Because, as you see, those pesky 9/11 Commission recommendations they screamed about will not be implemented.

Surprised? If you are, you must have voted for these fruitpies.

Democrats Reject Key 9/11 Panel Suggestion

It was a solemn pledge, repeated by Democratic leaders and candidates over and over: If elected to the majority in Congress, Democrats would implement all of the recommendations of the bipartisan commission that examined the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

But with control of Congress now secured, Democratic leaders have decided for now against implementing the one measure that would affect them most directly: a wholesale reorganization of Congress to improve oversight and funding of the nation's intelligence agencies. Instead, Democratic leaders may create a panel to look at the issue and produce recommendations, according to congressional aides and lawmakers.

Because plans for implementing the commission's recommendations are still fluid, Democratic officials would not speak for the record. But aides on the House and Senate appropriations, armed services and intelligence committees confirmed this week that a reorganization of Congress would not be part of the package of homeland-security changes up for passage in the "first 100 hours" of the Democratic Congress.

"I don't think that suggestion is going anywhere," said Rep. C.W. Bill Young (R-Fla.), the chairman of the Appropriations defense subcommittee and a close ally of the incoming subcommittee chairman, Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.). "That is not going to be their party position."

Aw, shucks, say the MSM. They can't do it, because...because...because...why again?

The liberal media finds out why - Nancy Pelosi is in deep trouble, and that's why.

Yeah, right.

Democratic leadership dust-ups this month severely limited the ability of House Speaker-elect Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) to implement the commission's recommendations, according to Democratic aides.

So, here's the story the liberal media wants you to buy: Downercrats said they would implement the 9/11 commission recommendations if they got control of Congress. However, now that they have control, things have gotten so bad for Nancy Pelosi even before she takes office as Speaker that she cannot do what she promised to do.

Four weeks after the election, you can almost see the vultures circling around the little party called Downercrat control of Congress. And this is before they actually take power. Yikes.

Sunday, December 03, 2006

More Love and Civility from The Palestinians: Now They Are Placing Bombs in Children's Toys

Those peaceful Palestinians* have come up with another step in their march to prove to the world that they definitely deserve a state of their own: they are now booby-trapping teddy bears with bombs to kill Israelis.

You have to hand it to the Palestinians: just when you think they can go no lower in their quest to be fully subhuman, they outdo themselves and go lower.

Nablus: Explosive teddy bears found in lab

A joint paratrooper and Shin Bet force uncovered an explosive lab in Nablus Friday night. In the lab, the forces found teddy bears with wires hanging from them, apparently slated to be used as explosive devices.

The lab was detonated in a controlled manner, and there were no reports of injuries.

The forces also found in the explosives lab three belts made from cloth, ready to contain explosives, a hollow coat used for hiding explosives, and 20 light bulbs and light sockets used for activating explosives.

Test tubes, a hollow gas tank, hollow pipes, batteries, 40 liters of hydrogen peroxide and ohms were also found in the lab.

Here's what the Israelis should do (but they won't - which is so much the sadder): they should hollow out Korans and fill them with bombs. Pass them out, we say. After all, Muslims seem to venerate the Koran more than their own lives, so - let 'er rip!

When a number of Muslims go up in smoke, and nasty Korans are blamed, maybe the world will take notice. They will blame Israel, no matter who does it.

*Yeah, right.

Saturday, December 02, 2006

An Indian Says of Muslims in India: "It is Not Our Fault"

Usually, most people are afraid to say what has to be said about Islam and Muslims and how they are slowly destroying the entire world. But one area where no one goes is how Muslims continue to operate in non-Muslims countries, never even trying to integrate, while at the same time carving out their own little communities (in these cases, ghettoes) and demanding their own laws and customs, living in poverty with many children, and crying "discrimination" at the same time.

From India, one man says to the Muslims in India who play this game: "It is not our fault."

Actually, we disagree. It is our fault that we have all allowed things to get to where they are today.


Retd. Justice Sachar Committee Report has highlighted the obvious-- that Muslims in India are at the lowest rung of economic well-being.

So, who’s responsible for the backward state of Muslims in India?

EDUCATION: If even the most illiterate and poor Indian believes that the govt schools are open for everyone and modern education can bring about change and prosperity to their lives, why Muslims still prefer to shy away from education or send their children to Madarsas, where all they learn is ‘majhabi’ education? In these Madarsas, no vocational training is given and those coming out of them are fit for becoming Islamic teachers only. Otherwise, many Muslim children are sent to earn money, unlike many of the SC/ST, for whom education provides the easiest way to get out of poverty. Low educational levels translate into less employment opportunities in mainstream jobs, ghettoisation and self-inflicted misery.

MISPLACED PRIORITIES: Do Muslims ever object to Haj subsidy and insist the govt to open schools and hospitals for them from this money? Has the Muslim society ever questioned the failure of the Muslim leadership to use the huge funds it receives from abroad to build modern schools and colleges for them, instead of mosques? For instance, the less than 3% Christian community has established such reputed educational institutions. The fact is that the Muslim leadership, both religious and political, is the enemy of the community they claim to represent because it is they who brainwash their followers to reject modern education.

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES AVAILABLE FOR MUSLIMS: When job opportunities –in govt, private sectors, Armed Forces and judiciary-- are equally available on the basis of merit only, how can anyone claim that there’s discrimination against Muslims? How come so many Muslim actors of the Mumbai film industry have been able to conquer the Indian audience if there is discrimination against them? Why is it that music maestros like Ustad Bismillah Khan, Ustad Allauddin Khan, and Ustad Amjad Ali Khan are venerated by the Indian public? Many similar instances may be given in every field of endeavor - sports, cinema, media, music, fine arts, science, business, etc. The industry doesn’t care about how well the candidate knows the Koran, the hadiths and other Islamic things. If the Muslims bothered to study things other than religion, then they stand a much better chance of getting jobs. And, if they’re educated, they stand a better chance of getting a loan from the banks for their business.

In point after point, the writer shows how Muslims have segregated themselves through their sick cult called a religion, their ridiculous customs, and their inability to live with others unless others adhere to their way of life.

This is not just happening in India - it is happening all over the world. And it is causing a showdown with millions of Muslims who wish to destroy the world rather than live in it.

Friday, December 01, 2006

Muslims Demand Special Place to Pray at Airports

On the heels of 6 imams being tossed a flight at Minneapolis' airport for allegedly mouthing anti-American statements and looking threatening, they are now demanding special prayer rooms for Muslims.

Now, imagine if Christians, or Jews, or Buddhists, demanded special "prayer rooms" at airports - the airport would say no, and the ACLU would sue if they said yes.

But if Muslims ask for this, they are to be commended.

When is this shit going to end? How much Islamic ass are we going to kiss?

Muslims Seek Prayer Room at Airport

meditation at the request of imams concerned about the removal of six Muslim clerics from a US Airways flight last week.
Steve Wareham, director of Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, said other airports have "meditation rooms" used for prayers or by passengers who simply need quiet time.

A group of Somali clerics met with airport officials Friday and said they would attract less attention if they had a private area for prayer. Devout Muslims pray five times daily, facing the holy city of Mecca.

"When we pray, we don't want a problem. We don't want what happened last week," said Abdulrehman Hersi, an imam at Darul-Quba mosque in Minneapolis, referring to six clerics who were barred from a US Airways flight in Minneapolis after drawing the concern of some passengers.

Airports in Nashville, Tenn.; Columbus, Ohio; and Fort Lauderdale, Fla., all advertise meditation rooms. Fort Lauderdale's is billed as "For travelers seeking a quiet time." All note they are nonsectarian.

Here is what these Muslims should get: NOTHING. And if the airport morons allow this, we need to find someone in Minneapolis who objects and sues - after all, the liberals decry the use of government facilities for religious uses. Here is where they can put up or shut up.

The Downercrats Continue with Their "Do as We Say, Not as We Do" Tour

It is now four weeks since the Downercrats, running on the platform of "elect us, and we will pull all of the troops out of Iraq, and fast!" mantra, won control of Congress.

As we have shown here, the MSM in America is now starting to print stories that show that the Downercrats were never serious about any of their alleged promises made before the election, and that the MSM knew this - and that they could care less if they were all lies.

Idea of Rapid Withdrawal From Iraq Seems to Fade

In the cacophony of competing plans about how to deal with Iraq, one reality now appears clear: despite the Democrats’ victory this month in an election viewed as a referendum on the war, the idea of a rapid American troop withdrawal is fast receding as a viable option.

The Times' reporter then goes on to mention how generals all dismiss any quick withdrawal - something they have been doing for a long time.

Now, however, the MSM is safely past the election. So if they report that "hell, the Downercrats made shit up to get elected," who is to care? After all, they don't. They are just thrilled that those evil Republicans are out of power, and they can continue to use the terms "civil war" and "lame duck" in their myriad of bullshit.

The Downercrats and their Old Motto: "Do as We Say, Not as We Do"

For months before the midterm elections, the Downercrats bitched about every conceivable subject, claiming that if somehow they could win control of Congress things would change for the better. Taxes? Raised! The war in Iraq? Ended! The 9/11 Commission's recommendations? We will implement all of them, the Downercrats yelled. Elect us - and watch what we do!

Well, they have been elected, and, as proven by their past track record, the Downercrats apparently (shock of shocks) merely wanted control of Congress so they could be in the majority. Because, as you see, those pesky 9/11 Commission recommendations they screamed about will not be implemented.

Surprised? If you are, you must have voted for these fruitpies.

Democrats Reject Key 9/11 Panel Suggestion

It was a solemn pledge, repeated by Democratic leaders and candidates over and over: If elected to the majority in Congress, Democrats would implement all of the recommendations of the bipartisan commission that examined the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

But with control of Congress now secured, Democratic leaders have decided for now against implementing the one measure that would affect them most directly: a wholesale reorganization of Congress to improve oversight and funding of the nation's intelligence agencies. Instead, Democratic leaders may create a panel to look at the issue and produce recommendations, according to congressional aides and lawmakers.

Because plans for implementing the commission's recommendations are still fluid, Democratic officials would not speak for the record. But aides on the House and Senate appropriations, armed services and intelligence committees confirmed this week that a reorganization of Congress would not be part of the package of homeland-security changes up for passage in the "first 100 hours" of the Democratic Congress.

"I don't think that suggestion is going anywhere," said Rep. C.W. Bill Young (R-Fla.), the chairman of the Appropriations defense subcommittee and a close ally of the incoming subcommittee chairman, Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.). "That is not going to be their party position."

Aw, shucks, say the MSM. They can't do it, because...because...because...why again?

The liberal media finds out why - Nancy Pelosi is in deep trouble, and that's why.

Yeah, right.

Democratic leadership dust-ups this month severely limited the ability of House Speaker-elect Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) to implement the commission's recommendations, according to Democratic aides.

So, here's the story the liberal media wants you to buy: Downercrats said they would implement the 9/11 commission recommendations if they got control of Congress. However, now that they have control, things have gotten so bad for Nancy Pelosi even before she takes office as Speaker that she cannot do what she promised to do.

Four weeks after the election, you can almost see the vultures circling around the little party called Downercrat control of Congress. And this is before they actually take power. Yikes.

Canada: Crime Committed by Burqa-Wearing Males

The burqa, that phony body cover that Muslims are now using to force their sick cult on non-Muslim countries, is being exploited by these same Muslims to allow them to act like females when in fact they are males.

Here is one example: 2 men, one wearing the burqa, robbed a jewelry store in Canada. The burqa was used to make the store owner think there were a man and a woman when there were, in fact, 2 males, with the burqa used as a disguise.

Jewel heists target Asians

Abdul Rasheed Khalid was alone in his Brampton jewellery store filling the display cases with yellow gold rings and necklaces when two people, one wearing a head-to-toe black burqa, appeared outside his locked door.

"Salamu alaikum," the 58-year-old store owner said after pushing the entry buzzer, believing them to be a Muslim couple. There was no reply, and seconds later the pair — both males — forced him at gunpoint to the back office where he was bound with duct tape and hit several times. Then his store was cleaned out.

"Keep quiet, keep quiet, close your eyes," they said, while emptying the red velvet trays into duffel bags carried by an accomplice. Khalid caught a glimpse of the crooks. He thinks they were Pakistani or Indian.

If these Islamic assholes were not allowed to use this phony dress as some religious garb in Western countries, this would be one less weapon in their arsenal.

This shit has to end. The burqa must be made illegal in all public places. Enough with

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?