Sunday, July 31, 2005
It's time again for our round-up of news from the Muslim world...impacting the lives of ordinary people as these fucking lunatics who follow Islam make the world a shittier place for all of us.
First up...Italy comes up with some common sense (some, not all) and bans the burqas, those hilarious Islamofucker uniforms that their (fat, ugly) women use to cover themselves with from head to toe.
Italy bans Islamic burqas
ITALY has banned Islamic burqas under tough terrorism laws that provide two-year jail terms and E2000 ($3200) fines for anyone caught covering their face in a public place.
The counter-terrorism package, passed by Italy's parliament yesterday, doubles the existing penalty for wearing a burqa or chador -- traditional robes worn by Muslim women to cover their faces -- or full-faced helmets or balaclavas in public.
However, it should be noted: the downside of this is that we will have to see what is behind those masks, and we bet that it cannot be good at all.
Next up...British police finally wake up, and offer to stop Muslim scum on the street, check if they are carrying bombs, and arrest if them if they are. Actually, they are merely going to keep an eye on these lowlifes, but the "liberal civil liberties/we don't care who gets blown up as long as Muslims have their civil rights" crowd is up in arms, the lousy bastards:
Searches to target ethnic groups
People from certain ethnic groups are more likely to be stopped and searched on London transport in the wake of the bombings, British Transport Police say.
A force spokesman said communities were not being singled out, but police have to "target the people we think may be involved" in bomb attacks.
The policy has been supported by Home Office minister Hazel Blears.
But Civil rights group Liberty said the move would lead to bombers using people who did not fit the usual profile.
It is hilarious to see the BBC have to report this, as they still believe that those who blew up 58 people on July 7 are simply "misguided young men out for a jaunt."
Finally, we get a story rich in hilarity...from no less a source than the BBC, who report with pride that Saddam Hussein was "attacked" but add that this is "according to his lawyers."
Saddam 'attacked' during hearing
Former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was attacked by an unidentified man after questioning by the Iraqi special tribunal on Thursday, his lawyers say.
The former president was attacked as he was leaving the courtroom, and there was an exchange of blows, his legal team said in a statement.
However, a US military spokeswoman denied that any such incident happened.
Remember that one of Saddam's "lawyers" is former US Attorney General Ramsay Clark, perhaps one of the most horrific Marxist liars and thugs in the world today - a man who defends the likes of Saddam and Slobodan Milosevic. Nice guy to believe, eh?
Well, that's our current Religion of PeaceTM Round-Up for this week...do stay tuned as we follow up and watch the world come closer to hell itself from these degenerates called Muslims.
Saturday, July 30, 2005
Another Muslim piece of crap has what to say about the attacks in London: for instance, the terrorists were "innocent victims"; and, for good measure, al-Qaeda does not exist.
Really? What was that little thing called 9/11 about again?
But take notice as to the headline of this story...not "Muslim Denies al-Qaeda Existence" or "Muslim Says Terrorists Are Innocent Victims," but:
Leading cleric rails at injustice of 'Muslim bashing'
The most senior Islamic cleric in Birmingham claimed yesterday that Muslims were being unjustly blamed in the war on terrorism [Perhaps we should blame Swedish senior citizens? - Ed.] and that the eight suspects in the two bombing attacks on London "could have been innocent passengers".
Mohammad Naseem, the chairman of the city's central mosque, called Tony Blair a "liar" and "unreliable witness" and questioned whether CCTV footage issued of the suspected bombers was of the perpetrators.
He said that Muslims "all over the world have never heard of an organisation called al-Qa'eda".
Mr Naseem, who was speaking after police seized Yasin Hassan Omar in Birmingham, delivered his unprompted outburst when he was invited to a press conference with West Midlands police and Birmingham city council to help calm fears of racial or religious tension after the arrest.
It was held near the police cordon in Heybarnes Road, where Omar was arrested.
His comments shocked senior police officers.
At some point, the question must be asked: when will we as a society - American, British, whichever - put our feet down and get rid of this cancer in our midst? And not just the cancer of Muslims, but the continuing cancer of a media which allows this shit to be covered up.
Friday, July 29, 2005
You heard it here first: We said that the alleged "religious edict," known as a "fatwa," which was issued by a group of American Muslims whom the American (read:moron) media labeled as "moderates" was a bogus pile of shit. And now, terrorism expert Steve Emerson - who has been calling on the world to fight Islamic terror for more than a decade now - agrees.
Now watch for the MSM to continue to peddle this story as some new move to denounce terrorism by American Muslims.
The American Islamic Leaders' "Fatwa" is Bogus
This morning a group of American Islamic leaders held a press conference to announce a fatwa, or Islamic religious ruling, against “terrorism and extremism.” An organization called the Fiqh Council of North America (FCNA) issued the fatwa, and the Council on American - Islamic Relations (CAIR) organized the press conference, stating that several major U.S. Muslim groups endorsed the fatwa.
In fact, the fatwa is bogus. Nowhere does it condemn the Islamic extremism ideology that has spawned Islamic terrorism. It does not renounce nor even acknowledge the existence of an Islamic jihadist culture that has permeated mosques and young Muslims around the world. It does not renounce Jihad let alone admit that it has been used to justify Islamic terrorist acts. It does not condemn by name any Islamic group or leader. In short, it is a fake fatwa designed merely to deceive the American public into believing that these groups are moderate. In fact, officials of both organizations have been directly linked to and associated with Islamic terrorist groups and Islamic extremist organizations. One of them is an unindicted co-conspirator in a current terrorist case; another previous member was a financier to Al-Qaeda.
As they say: read the whole thing.
Thursday, July 28, 2005
The "Muslim Council of North America" (better known as "Some Group of Muslim Thugs Who Speak Nicely") has issued a "fatwa," or religious edict, against terrorism. But have they? In fact, they have called for an end to "unjust killings of civilians," which allows them to condemn Israel and the United States while seeming to sound reasonable about the maggots in their own cult.
We have one response to this order: What a crock of shit!
Muslim Scholars Condemn Terrorists
Following deadly bombings in Britain and other nations, American Muslim scholars issued an edict Thursday condemning religious extremism and calling terrorists "criminals, not 'martyrs."'
The 18-member Fiqh Council of North America said Muslims were barred from helping "any individual or group that is involved in any act of terrorism or violence."
"There is no justification in Islam for extremism or terrorism," the scholars wrote in the edict, called a fatwa. "Targeting civilians' life and property through suicide bombings or any other method of attack is haram — or forbidden."
This should be exposed for that it is - a hilarious piece of worthless garbage.
In the past, when Muslims were asked to condemn terrorism, they included "wars of aggression by Americans and Zionists" as being counted as "terrorism."
These people are not serious about stopping Islamic terrorism. They use nice words and Koran phrases to show that they somehow wish to have Islamic nutjobs stop terrorizing the entire world. But secretly, deep down, they cheer the likes of Palestinian suicide bombers and bin Laden. They are the same rank of scum - only the liberal media will buy their malarkey.
Before bombs went off in London on July 7, Britain was not very interested in the war on Islamic terrorism - in fact, Tony Blair demanded the release of British citizens held in Guantanamo Bay and, when we handed them over to English authorities, released them without investigating that these men had been involved in terrorism worldwide. So it comes as no surprise that the man behind the bombings on July 7 was under US surveillance - and when the US asked Britain to arrest him, Tony Blair's government refused the request.
I wonder: is Tony Blair feeling like an asshole right about now?
Sources: Britain denied U.S. arrest request before bombings
British authorities denied a U.S. request to apprehend a man believed to have ties to the July 7 London bombings weeks before the deadly attacks, sources familiar with the investigation said Thursday.
Haroon Rashid Aswat, 30, a British-born citizen of Indian heritage, is in custody in Zambia, U.S. and Zambian officials told CNN.
U.S. authorities wanted to capture Aswat, who was then in South Africa, and question him about a 1999 plot to establish a "jihad training camp" in Bly, Oregon.
According to the sources, U.S. officials had Aswat under surveillance in South Africa weeks before the July 7 attacks that killed 52 commuters and the four bombers.
U.S. authorities had asked South Africa if they could take Aswat into custody. South Africa relayed the request to Britain, but authorities there refused because he was a British citizen, the sources said.
Before bombs went off in London, the British were ambivalent at best about fighting Islamic terror. Even now, as 50+ people lay dead from Islamic loons blowing themselves up in London's train and bus system and more attacks appear likely, Muslims stand on street corners in London and other British cities and scream for jihad and for more attacks. If he were in America, he would be arrested. In Britain, he gets welfare payments and free housing.
Perhaps if a nuclear weapon takes out London, the British may finally wake up that the threat is in their midst. Then again, from current evidence, perhaps not.
Germany under Adolf, er, Gerhard Schroeder, the soon-to-be retired dimwit Chancellor, has been an utter disaster when it comes to making sure the terrorist cells - connected to 9/11 - in his country are shut down and destroyed. Now a German court has sided with Islamic terrorists and thrown out any attempt to crack down on these pieces of crap:
High court throws out anti-terror wiretapping law
KARLSRUHE, GERMANY - In a setback for anti-terror investigators, Germany's high court Wednesday ruled that a state law giving authorities sweeping powers to tap phones is unconstitutional.
The Federal Constitutional Court said the law violates the Germany constitution's guarantees of freedom from official eavesdropping.
At issue was a 2003 law in the state of Lower Saxony enacted in the wake of the September 11 attacks. The attacks were plotted and carried out by Islamic terrorists based in Hamburg, adjacent to Lower Saxony.
The court, in rejecting the law, noted that the framers of Germany's post-war constitution specifically wanted to prevent a recurrence of Gestapo police-state surveillance.
The Germans are now on the side of the terrorists, not on the side of those fighting terror. The US government needs to crack down on Germany, and make it harder for any cooperation to occur until their attitude changes.
If you read anything from the left, you are guaranteed to find a world of imbecility that outranks anything you have ever seen before. Check out this story on an upcoming "anti-Bush" (surprised, no?!?) movie coming out...but see who the writer compares this crappola to:
Sony books Bush critic's political thriller
Sony Pictures is negotiating to acquire film rights to the first novel from Richard Clarke, the counterterrorism expert who accused the Bush administration of ignoring the terrorist threat before the Sept. 11 attacks.
His novel, "The Scorpion Gate," will be published in October by Putnam Adult. The studio hopes the film adaptation will be the first in a series of John Clancy-style political thrillers. The project will be produced by former studio chief John Calley.
Whew! Now if I only knew who John Clancy was! Perhaps this leftist moron who wrote this piece means Tom Clancy!
Australian leftists are basically no different than leftists around the world: they hate the countries they live in, do their utmost to hurt their countries, and reward bad behavior. So it comes as no surprise that a leftist group of thugs in Australia has rewarded an essay on how it feels to be a suicide bomber - written by a juvenile girl, no less:
First prize for hatred
IT is not just mad sheiks who are rewarding youngsters who dream up fantasies of evil Americans and heroic suicide bombers.
Our taxpayer-funded Adult Multicultural Education Services does the same, funding a writer's prize for a schoolgirl's essay on blowing up American soldiers.
Mad, I know. But multiculturalism does mess with minds like that.
I won't mention the name of the self-described "South African Kiwi" girl who has just won the junior short story competition at the annual City of Greater Dandenong Adult Migrant Education Services awards, sponsored by AMES.
She is only 11, after all, and clearly has compassion, imagination and fine writing skills -- so much so that when she says she might like to become a journalist, I can assure her she'll fit right in.
What's more, she is writing fiction, not necessarily describing her personal views at all.
So my criticism is not of her, but of those who try to mould her mind, and those of other children in this suburb of many Muslim students, by giving this essay -- with this message -- a multicultural prize. Here are extracts of her story of a young Iraqi girl fleeing Baghdad:
I waken to the sounds of bombs. Women and children crying. Rubble. That is all there is to see.
Baghdad: once filled with beds of flowers and happy smiling faces. Now destroyed homes: destroyed families -- no peace, no hope ...
I miss my ma and papa so much. Images of their mangled bodies lying in pools of blood will never leave my mind ...
The back door opens. Two American soldiers. The enemy. The destroyers, who say they are here to save us. I hate the Americans ...
"Get them to the camp," the gruff one orders ...
A prisoner of war with nothing to live for except maybe to uphold the memories of my beloved Allah, my parents and my country.
To truly show the world what it means to be Muslim, I reach under my salwaar kameez and release the catch of dynamite strapped to my chest. Two minutes. Silence. THEN!!!!!
How powerful is war?
Here is our essay...where can we submit it?
I saw the Muslim standing in the street.
He was swarthy, he smelled, and flies flew around him.
He was carrying a backpack.
I got closer, and noticed that a wire was hanging out of the backpack.
I realized that this Muslim scumbag was going to explode himself and kill innocent people.
Instead of yelling, "Put your hands up!" I reached for my weapon, drew it, and fired three shots into the Muslim's head.
The lowlife was dead.
The bomb in his pack would not go off.
No innocent people were harmed.
Now all I have to do is find someone to clean this shit off the street.
Now...how is that? I bet it would make for a great song!
Wednesday, July 27, 2005
Now that President Bush has named Judge John Roberts, Jr., to be an Associate Justice on the US Supreme Court, the Downies on Capitol Hill (forget the sicko leftists around the country) are using every excuse to try to undermine Roberts. "We want tax documents!" yell the Downies. "We want to see Solicitor General documents!" yell the Downies. "We want to see Mrs. Roberts' underwear!" yell the Downies.
Okay, they don't want Mrs. Roberts' underwear, at least not yet. But they do want to see documents when Roberts served in the Solicitor General's office under Attorney General William French Smith. The Bush administration says that these documents are covered by attorney-client privilege...and guess what? Former Solicitors General, half from Downie administrations, agree with President Bush:
Ex-solicitors general weigh in on Estrada probe
All seven former solicitors general of the United States signed a letter to Sen. Patrick Leahy Tuesday urging him to drop his request for confidential documents in his probe of judicial nominee Miguel Estrada.
Leahy, D-Vermont, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee which considers the nominations of federal judges, has demanded Justice Department documents containing the internal recommendations made by Estrada when he served in the solicitor general's office during Janet Reno's tenure as Attorney General.
Three of the solicitors general served under Democratic administrations, four under Republican presidents.
"Any attempt to intrude into the Office's highly privileged deliberations would come at the cost of the Solicitor General's ability to defend vigorously the United States' litigation interests -- a cost that also would be borne by Congress itself," the former officials said in a copy of the letter obtained by CNN,.
The Justice Department's solicitor general decides when and how to appeal cases on behalf of the government, and represents the interests of the entire government including both the Executive Branch and the Congress in federal courts.
"Although we profoundly respect the Senate's duty to evaluate Mr. Estrada's fitness for the federal judiciary, we do not think that the confidentiality and integrity of internal deliberations should be sacrificed in the process," the letter concluded.
The letter was written by Seth Waxman, the last of three solicitors general under the Clinton administration. The letter was sent on behalf of Waxman, Walter Dellinger, and Drew Days of the Clinton administration; Kenneth Starr from the George H.W. Bush administration; Charles Fried who served under Ronald Reagan; Robert Bork who also served under Reagan; and Archibald Cox who served under President John F. Kennedy.
This was done by Downies to scuttle the nomination of Miguel Estrada to the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit. Now they are trying it again. Senator Leahy, asshole that he is (he's from Vermont, home of Jim Jeffords AND Howard Dean), continues to argue otherwise.
Are Downies just stupid? Or do they wake up every morning intending to lie their way through the day?
This would be a fantastic idea for a book, for someone ballsy enough to write it: how the labor movement, slowly dying since the 1960s, threw their lot in completely with the Downtrodden Party, used vital resources needed for workers, not party development, to help the Downies try to win elections, and how, in the end, both lost more ground than gained and left both tired, shopworn, and in full disintegration mode by the middle of 2005. The key villains of this story are John Sweeney, head of the AFL-CIO and a man wholly out of touch with any sense of reality, Downie leaders like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid and Bill Clinton, and others in the liberal movement who spent millions of hard-earned dollars stolen from American workers by their unions to aid Downie candidates and in the end bought them nothing.
The Wall Street Journal touched on this story in Tuesday's opinion piece; check out the money quote highlighted below:
Very Old Labor
In the wake of the GOP takeover of Congress the year before, Mr. Sweeney promised to pour hundreds of millions of dollars into electoral politics to stop the Gingrich revolution. He staffed AFL-CIO headquarters with activists from the political left - environmental groups, culturally liberal outfits - and made the union consortium a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democratic Party.
A decade later we can see how that turned out. Democrats remain in the House and Senate minority, and union membership continues to decline across the American economy. The unionized share of the total U.S. work force has been sliding steadily for years, and was down again last year to 12.5% from 12.9% in 2003. In the more dynamic private sector, only 7.9% of employees now carry the union label.
Imagine for a moment, if you will, that a major movement of workers had millions of dollars stolen from them to get Republicans elected, whether they liked it or not, at the same time that the corrupt leaders of this movement were doing nothing to save the movement they allegedly led. These millions helped no one, even as the workers they were stolen from lost their jobs because the movement did everything it could to make American industry so unprofitable in America that they took their factories and jobs to Mexico and China. And, in the end, after years of theft and do-nothing politics from the supporters of this movement, the movement was split into 2 camps, and the party they supported had been at its lowest in number of representatives in Washington than at any time in more than a century, with the other party in firm control of all three branches of government. What would the liberal media call this? We can see the headlines of rags such as The New York Times: "How Big Labor and the Republicans Destroyed Each Other." Or the WaPo: "Millions Siphoned from American Workers Fed the Republican Party But Led to Increased Losses." Or, perhaps, the LA Times: "How Sweeney's Stolen Millions Helped the GOP." We would see Downies rushing to microphones to call for an investigation how millions were stolen from American workers. The MSM would have repeated and in-depth stories on what happened, with tons of thick hilarity on the shape of Republican politics.
Now, in the real world the words "Republican" and "GOP" should be replaced by "Downtrodden Party" and "Downies." But there will be no stories - and no investigation by any court or investigator. And so much the shame.
Tuesday, July 26, 2005
Yep, we received the following e-mail from former US Senator Max Cleland, current liar who, it was discovered, was injured in Vietnam not from being wounded in action but from juggling several hand grenades and having one of them go off, costing Maxie Baby his legs and one of his arms.
Said Mr. Cleland is trying to push the candidacy of a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom, who is running as a Downie to a congressional seat in Ohio. Maxie sounds a little angry. I wonder why?
Marine Major and Democrat Paul Hackett could be a first for our country -- the first veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom to be elected to Congress. He fought in the Fallujah campaign, took part in reconstruction efforts and worked side-by-side with Iraqi military and civil personnel.
[How interesting...Downies spit on soldiers who serve, until somehow they return and run for political office as Downies. Then they are people to pay attention to. - Editor]
Paul Hackett knows what's really happening in Iraq. [And he would be the first in his party. - Editor] And, he's ready to take his experience to Washington. He's running in the August 2nd special election in Ohio's 2nd Congressional District stretching from just outside Cincinnati eastward along the Ohio River.
Paul's campaign has a tough fight against some of the most entrenched special interests in Ohio. His opponent, Jean Schmidt, is a favorite of the corrupt and ever-present Republican establishment -- one that never misses an opportunity to smear and cheat.
[Corrupt? Entrenched special interests? Do I hear some accusations being thrown around? Does Maxie offer any proof? Of course not - just smear and slander from the Left. - Editor]
Take a look at a day in the life of the two candidates. On the night of October 25, 2004, Jean Schmidt had dinner at an expensive restaurant and partied at a Bengals game in Cincinnati. Her trip, sponsored by a global bio-tech lobbyist, yielded yet another ethics scandal for Ohio Republicans.
That same evening, Paul and his men were keeping insurgents' supplies from entering war-torn Falluja. They ate the standard-issue MRE and fought to defend Iraqi civilians and their fellow troops.
[Imagine the reaction if Republicans offered a "let's compare the GOP and Downies and what they did today" ad. For instance, today President Bush is working for America, and John Kerry flew to France to check out the Tour de France. The Downies would scream if that happened - but they can do it all day long. - Editor]
At the end of the day, the choice for voters couldn't be clearer. In Jean Schmidt, they have the hand-picked choice of the backslapping insiders who sell the process to the highest-bidding right-wing group or corporate interest.
[More slander. Proof? One iota of any forthcoming, Maxie? Just one? - Editor]
In Paul Hackett, voters have someone with first-hand experience in uniform and the drive to solve problems and put us on the right track. He proudly served his country in Iraq, and he's ready to serve in Washington.
[I think the 99% of veterans who return who run for office (as Republicans) should use this as a standard. Let's see the reaction of the left, and then ignore them as usual. - Editor]
Tell your friends, family and neighbors about what's happening in Ohio's 2nd District because it's a preview of what's to come next year - real leaders stepping up to serve at a time of abuse of power and corruption in government.
[I wonder if Mr. Hackett knows that his party is rooting for him and his fellow vets to lose in Iraq and Afghanistan. - Editor]
Senator Max Cleland
Downies seem to find heroism when one vet returns from a war that Downies denounce and runs for office as one of them. Otherwise, they have hatred, contempt, and lots of spit for those vets who deign to return and not agree with the Left that America is a criminal nation and its soldiers are committing war crimes on a daily basis. We have no bad words for Mr. Hackett - but how he can run in the same party which boasts the likes of Dennis Kucinich, Jim McDermott, and Jane Fonda is something he needs to answer for.
PS - Even Downies admit that Schmidt will win that seat in August.
Monday, July 25, 2005
The "online encyclopedia" called Wikipedia has made sure that anti-Semitic and Marxist thugsite DailyKos is profiled on their site - and when I tried to make it sound more fair, I was banned from doing any editing for 24 hours. So, I figured, if you can't beat them, at least try to out argument them...and started a page called "Joobo the King of Wisdom" to highlight the thoughts of this site. So what did "Wikipedia" do? They slated our site for deletion.
Joobo the King of Wisdom
This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy.
How interesting. Was "DailyKos" considered for deletion? Not at all - the Marxist anti-Semites at Wikipedia made sure that any changes to that site were changed back to make it look like DailyKos is a fair site for all kind people to read.
This is the problem with the liberals - they desire free speech, but only for them.
That liberals hate America and Americans and war heroes killed in a war they detest is no surprise; they try to mask these feelings with the old canard of "We love the troops and want them to come home." Now and again, however, they give away the store, and let out their true feelings. Here is just one of the worst, which the MSM missed completely:
Vandals torch 20 U.S. flags, car
American flags, lining the lawn of the mother- and father-in-law of fallen U.S. Army Pfc. Timothy Hines Jr., were heaped in a pile early Saturday and burned under a car parked in front of the home - less than 24 hours after Hines was buried in Cincinnati's Spring Grove Cemetery.
Jim Wessel, Hines' father-in-law, said he thinks that the fire was a random act of vandalism.
The flames totaled Sara Wessel's car.
Sara is Hines' sister-in-law and Jim Wessel's oldest daughter. She had been staying at the house on Sando Drive since the family returned last week from Washington, D.C., where they were visiting Hines at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.
Hines, 21, was buried Friday after more than 400 people mourned his passing and celebrated his life at the Vineyard Community Church in Springdale. He was buried with full military honors, leaving behind a pregnant widow who expects to give birth in about two weeks and a 2-year-old daughter.
Although no suspect(s) were arrested, it is hard to believe that anyone other than an America-hating liberal would do something like this.
If this had been an anti-war protestor who suffered such an act, the likes of CNN, MSNBC, and CBS would have interrupted shows like CSI with news alerts and important updates. But if the mother of a war hero killed in battle happens to be the victim, these media outlets would rather cover a hot day in Chicago.
Those poor, poor Muslims (fucking terrorist scum)...they feel embattled (pieces of shit), terrorized by people around them (after blowing them up) for something they might have done - could it be their support of terrorism? They feel like they do not belong in the societies in which they live - because for years they moved into countries and led lives apart from the rest of those societies, setting up their own banks, their own businesses, their own lives. And deep inside these lives were lunatics building bombs and advocating death to innocents - and they were protected by Muslim leaders who denounce any move to crack down on extremism in their ranks, mainly because Islam is an extreme cult.
British Muslims - most of them leeches who suck off the teet of Western kindness to which they return the feelings of death, hatred, and "jihad" - are not feeling any more love from the English people, and may want to leave the UK.
I say: get some planes and let's fly the whole rotten lot out of England, America, and anywhere else we can think of getting rid of these maggots as soon as is humanly possible.
Two-thirds of Muslims consider leaving UK
Hundreds of thousands of Muslims have thought about leaving Britain after the London bombings, according to a new Guardian/ICM poll.
The figure illustrates how widespread fears are of an anti-Muslim backlash following the July 7 bombings which were carried out by British born suicide bombers.
The poll also shows that tens of thousands of Muslims have suffered from increased Islamophobia, with one in five saying they or a family member have faced abuse or hostility since the attacks.
Boo-fucking-hoo: Poor Muslims are "suffering" from "increased Islamophobia." I call that "Islamobombophobia" - the fear of having Mohammad Fucking Muslim blow himself up while sitting next to me on a train or a bus.
My message to these Muslims is: Leave now, and don't wait for us to wave bye-bye as you leave. And please make it soon - this way, we can use the billions of welfare dollars and pounds for people who love being in America and England.
If you have never heard of Catherine Baker Knoll, you soon will: She is the (read: liberal) Lt. Governor of Pennsylvania, under the nominally moderate Governor Ed Rendell. But Ms. Knoll - whom the Downies are probably grooming for national office as we speak - has a slight problem: she is a fucking loon. And why, you ask? Because she went to the funeral of a soldier killed in Iraq, and there denounced the war and said that the government is against the war:
Lt. gov. crashed Marine's funeral, kin say
The family of a Marine who was killed in Iraq is furious with Lt. Gov. Catherine Baker Knoll for showing up uninvited at his funeral this week, handing out her business card and then saying "our government" is against the war.
Rhonda Goodrich of Indiana, Pa., said yesterday that a funeral was held Tuesday at a church in Carnegie for her brother-in-law, Staff Sgt. Joseph Goodrich, 32.
She said he "died bravely and courageously in Iraq on July 10, serving his country."
In a phone interview, Goodrich said the funeral service was packed with people "who wanted to tell his family how Joe had impacted their lives."
Then, suddenly, "one uninvited guest made an appearance, Catherine Baker Knoll."
She sat down next to a Goodrich family member and, during the distribution of communion, said, "Who are you?" Then she handed the family member one of her business cards, which Goodrich said she still has.
"Knoll felt this was an appropriate time to campaign and impose her will on us," Goodrich said. "I am amazed and disgusted Knoll finds a Marine funeral a prime place to campaign."
Goodrich said she is positive that Knoll was not invited to the funeral, which was jammed with Marines in dress uniform and police officers, because the fallen Marine had been a policeman in McKeesport and Indiana County.
"Our family deserves an apology," Rhonda Goodrich said. "Here you have a soldier who was killed -- dying for his country -- in a church full of grieving family members and she shows up uninvited. It made a mockery of Joey's death."
What really upset the family, Goodrich said, is that Knoll said, 'I want you to know our government is against this war,' " Goodrich said.
The people of Pennsylvania need to call, write, and bellow to the state capital in Harrisburg with the following message: Ms. Knoll needs to be removed from office. She is deranged. No one like that should be one heartbeat away from controlling one of our largest states.
If she were a Republican, the liberals would be marching. It is only fair play that Republicans do the same.
Sunday, July 24, 2005
The AFL-CIO has been on the cutting edge of destroying America's ability to compete in the world; it is one of the reasons most of our industries have moved to Mexico or China - to escape union bloodsuckers who have ravaged America. The President of the union, John Sweeney, is a pedantic old fart under whom union membership has continued its historic (and welcome) plunge. Now some of the member unions see Sweeney as the problem, and are ready to break up the AFL-CIO to get what they want.
Happy days are here again!
Largest Union Decides to Bolt AFL-CIO
The AFL-CIO succumbed to division Sunday, with its largest union deciding to bolt the 50-year-old federation and three others poised to do so in a dispute over how to reverse organized labor's long slide.
The four unions, representing nearly one-third of the AFL-CIO's 13 million members, announced Sunday they would boycott the federation's convention that begins Monday. They are part of the Coalition to Win, a group of seven unions vowing to reform the labor movement - outside the AFL-CIO if necessary.
The Service Employees International Union, with 1.8 million members, plans to announce Monday that it is leaving the AFL-CIO, said several labor officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to discuss the developments.
The Teamsters union also was on the verge of disaffiliating, and would likely to be the first to follow SEIU's lead, the officials said. Two other boycotting unions were likely to leave the federation: United Food and Commercial Workers and UNITE HERE, a group of textile and hotel workers.
Breaking up the unions harms the Downtrodden Party as well, as they depend on union dues stolen from workers to fund Downie campaigns nationwide.
So for America, this is a win; for the Republicans, this is a win; for the American worker, so long under the thumb of the Marxist-led unions, this is a day of liberation long coming. Cheers!
Friday, July 22, 2005
The BBC World news this evening began with "Suspects identified in Attempted Attacks; Urgently Sought."
Uh, folks...How about "IF YOU SEE THESE FUCKERS, GET THEM!"?
Police issue bomb suspect images
Scotland Yard has issued CCTV images of four men it wants to question over the failed bomb attacks on three Tube trains and a bus in London.
It is not yet clear if a man shot dead by plain clothes officers at Stockwell Tube station on Friday was one of them.
Scotland Yard urged anyone who knew the whereabouts of the men captured on CCTV to call 999.
Here's hoping these four are not captured, but crowds find them and beat them to death right in the street. Now let's see that kind of footage aired on al-Jazeera. We would pay to see that.
The Muslims in Britain are conspiring to blow up innocent people, and there are numerous arrests as they shuffle around like the cockroaches that they are. But do Muslim leaders express sorrow for these acts of terror? Are they working to stop further attacks? No! They are warning England to change their ways or there will be more attacks:
Change foreign policy - top Muslims
Senior Muslims have warned the Government that it needed to revise British foreign policy if it wants to put an end to the violence.
Dr Azzam Tamimi, from the Muslim Association of Britain, said the country was in real danger and that this would continue so long as British forces remained in Iraq.
He described the July 7 bombings and the attempted attacks in London on Thursday as "horrifying" but said it was not enough to simply unite in condemnation of the bombers.
If Tony Blair had any balls he would have these maggots arrested and immediately deported from Britain to some scumbag Islamic country which is still locked firmly in the 9th century. But Blair continues to adhere to the "Islam is a religion of peace" bullshit, and he will resist doing anything.
So much the shame. And because of that stand, these pieces of Muslim crap will feel emboldened to commit yet more acts of terror.
When we will all wake up to this danger? When it is too late?
Palestinian police are investigating the case of an Arab boy stabbed to death in the West Bank city of Nablus. "Eyewitnesses" initially said that "Jewish settlers" marched into the city and stabbed the boy, but when the case was investigated the boy's friend said that the murderers were Palestinians.
Police probe Palestinians in killing of W.Bank boy
NABLUS, West Bank (Reuters) - Palestinian security forces said on Thursday they were investigating the possibility that Palestinians stabbed a 12-year-old boy to death in the West Bank, after earlier saying witnesses had blamed Jewish settlers.
The boy was playing in a river bed on Wednesday night near Qaryot village when he was attacked and killed.
Immediately after the incident, a Palestinian security official said witnesses had reported the boy had been stabbed by Jewish settlers who had marched into the village, south of the West Bank city of Nablus.
But senior Palestinian security officials investigating the incident said on Thursday there was no evidence that settlers had been behind the stabbing.
I wonder how long it will be before al-Jazeera has an hour-long program on why Jews killed this boy, and then their willing accomplices in the civilized world (read: anti-Semitic leftists) repeat the fraud as truth.
You've got it right...while most political parties with any pride whatsoever usually use their candidates to get voters to the polls, Downies in Philadelphia use the lure of free cheese to get their voters to vote - and now people are asking for an "incheestigation" into, er, CheeseGate:
A Cheesy Way To Lure Voters
In Philadelphia they're calling it "The Cheese Caper." A Deputy City Commissioner asked the District Attorney's office to investigate who passed out flyers on primary election day -- May 17 -- promising free cheese to voters for particular candidates. The flyers are topped by a handwritten scrawl, "Come Out + Vote," adding below, "For Who Ever." In type, they say "Free Cheese." The flyers list two candidates, both Democrats, running in an area dominated by the 300-plus-unit Hill Creek housing project. "This guy comes to the polls, votes, and asks us for his free cheese," says Eileen Kleindienst, a Republican judge of elections. Geraldine Hacker, the Republican official who sent Kleindienst's complaint to the DA, thought the food might be from a government nutrition program.
The woman who wrote the flyers, Hill Creek tenant council President Gerri Robinson, doesn't think she did anything wrong. "The people around here, you can't get them to come out and do nothing unless you're giving them something," she says. Besides, she adds, the flyers worked: The two cases of cottage cheese were gone by day's end.
The Downies are such a worthless gang of thugs that they need cheese to get people to vote for them. Next perhaps they can offer increased welfare payments, which is what most of their voters live on.
Either way, isn't this kind of shit illegal?
We are in a war. President Bush is working his ass off to get the economy working for every American. And he is trying to outwit vicious Downies on Capitol Hill who don't give a whit about the American people. He is working for us.
And what do liberals discuss? Bush's exercise regimen...and the pro-terror lowlifes at the LA Times find it, well, "creepy."
The (over)exercise of power
A week ago, when President Bush met with Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III to interview him for a potential Supreme Court nomination, the conversation turned to exercise. When asked by the president of the United States how often he exercised, Wilkinson impressively responded that he runs 3 1/2 miles a day. Bush urged him to adopt more cross-training. "He warned me of impending doom," Wilkinson told the New York Times.
Am I the only person who finds this disturbing? I don't mean the fact that Bush would vet his selection for the highest court in the land in part on something utterly trivial. That's expected. What I mean is the fact that Bush has an obsession with exercise that borders on the creepy.
Here's a note to Mr. Chait: No one asked you to worry about how the President exercises. He runs, he jogs, he uses a bike. I do not remember how many of your leftist ilk were concerned when the previous President got HIS exercise by getting his dick sucked by interns and by abusing women in his employe, then lying about it to federal grand juries.
Mind your fucking business, you asshole.
Thursday, July 21, 2005
This is the difference between "old Europe" and "new Europe": those in the former blame America and the West and its values for terrorism; those in the latter sphere realize that it is that kind of asskissing that will lead to more terrorism, not less. It is easy to peg those in the former camp: France, Germany (under Adolf Schroeder), Spain, and even England in some cases. In the latter is Poland, Bulgaria, and even Italy in some cases. Add to this listing the Czech Republic, and their brave President, Vaclav Klaus, who speaks out in a new interview:
Klaus says multiculturalism, immigration cause terrorism
The excessive openness of the West to immigrants from other cultural environments facilitates attacks by radical Islamists in western countries, President Vaclav Klaus said in an interview printed Saturday in the daily Mlada fronta Dnes (MfD).
"This [openness] is in any case a suitable soil for these things [attacks] to happen," Klaus said.
He said that multiculturalism is a tragic mistake of western civilisation for which all will pay dearly. Such openness is not the direct cause of terror, but it is terrorism's fundamental cause, Klaus said. He compared multiculturalism to the role Marx's teaching played in the crimes of communism.
He said at the same time that multiculturalism is not an explanation for the recent attacks in London. "Multiculturalism is an ideology that says that you should emigrate and to make claim to your civilisation, your group and ethnic interests" in the new countries, Klaus said.
"Mass emigration has emerged as a false ideology according to which there exists a kind of claim, a general human right to wander anywhere around the world," Klaus said.
He added that this suppresses the civil rights of the original inhabitants.
If people leave for a place, they should fully accept the place, Klaus said. He said there is a hope for remedy in that this demand is shared by more and more countries, and that the naive ideas from about 30 years ago no longer apply.
Cheers to President Klaus. This is one reason why America must concentrate on being allies with "new" Europe, and ignore the whiny thugs and morons of "old" Europe.
It is usually impossible to find liberals who criticize the Left for their sick, perverted fealty to the Muslims who intend on destroying the civilized world. However, one of them, Peter Tatchell, a British human rights campaigner, does just that:
Peter Tatchell (Human Rights campaigner, London)
We are witnessing one of the greatest betrayals by the left since so-called left-wingers backed the Hitler-Stalin pact and opposed the war against Nazi fascism. Today, the pseudo-left reveals its shameless hypocrisy and its wholesale abandonment of humanitarian values. While it deplores the 7/7 terrorist attack on London, only last year it welcomed to the UK the Muslim cleric, Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who endorses the suicide bombing of innocent civilians. These same right-wing leftists back the so-called 'resistance' in Iraq. This 'resistance' uses terrorism against civilians as its modus operandi - stooping to the massacre of dozens of Iraqi children in order kill a few US soldiers. Terrorism is not socialism; it is the tactic of fascism. But much of the left doesn't care. Never mind what the Iraqi people want, it wants the US and UK out of Iraq at any price, including the abandonment of Iraqi socialists, trade unionists, democrats and feminists. If the fake left gets its way, the ex-Baathists and Islamic fundamentalists could easily seize power, leading to Iranian-style clerical fascism and a bloodbath. I used to be proud to call myself a leftist. Now I feel shame. Much of the left no longer stands for the values of universal human rights and international socialism.
Of course, Tatchell continues to peddle the tired and shopworn old "socialism is the answer" canard, but his slamming of the left means that even those inside that sick movement see the true face of the cancer that is the international left.
Just 24 hours after we prayed that if terrorists were to again hit the city of London that they target pro-terrorist lowlife Mayor Ken Livingstone, the Muslim scum did so again - but somehow they left Kenny intact:
Small blasts strike three London tube stations, one bus
The London police say two arrests have been made in connection with Thursday's attacks in London. Four small explosions on London's subways and a bus threw midday London into turmoil, two weeks after a terrorist attack claimed dozens of lives in the city.
The Scotsman of Edinburgh editorializes on Islamic Kenny:
Outrage as Livingstone tries to 'explain' suicide bombers
Ken Livingstone, the mayor of London, yesterday stunned even his political opponents by claiming the terrorist attacks on the city a fortnight ago were motivated by British foreign policy in the Middle East.
Shattering the political truce that had emerged since the four bomb attacks, Mr Livingstone said resentment was being fuelled as a result of the treatment of detainees by United States troops at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. He went so far as to suggest the English public would themselves resort to suicide bombings if placed under certain circumstances.
We can only say: What kind of response would Livingstone's family have if Kenny were a victim of his Islamic terror buddies? We can only guess. But in the meantime, those Muslims target innocents, not pieces of shit like Ken Livingstone.
The Downtrodden Party, maggots of the earth that they are (with all due apologies to maggots for comparing them to scumbag Downies), do not just hate America and Americans - they hate American institutions...such as the Boy Scouts.
Want evidence? Check out this story:
Senate GOP eyes counter punches to aid Boy Scouts
Senate Republican leaders plan to move legislation next year to protect the Boy Scouts of America from attacks by liberal groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union over government ties to the organization, which has an oath that acknowledges God.
The Defense Department recently agreed to warn military bases that department policy does not allow them to be official sponsors of Boy Scout units and that military personnel may sponsor Boy Scout groups only in their civilian capacity.
Wow! That sounds like something everyone should get behind, right? Well, not everyone, it seems. Check out the portion of the story which tags the goddamned Downies as the scum that they truly are:
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist introduced legislation this month stipulating that no federal law, directive, rule, instruction or order should limit any federal agency from providing support to the Boy Scouts or Girl Scouts, including meetings held on federal property.
"To this legislator, the ACLU's continued attacks on the Boy Scouts is starting to become its own form of persecution," said the Tennessee Republican, a former Scout, in a floor speech Nov. 20.
He tried to get the measure through the Senate by unanimous consent in the waning days of the congressional session, but Senate Democrats rebuffed him.
Let us repeat that: Senate Downies rebuffed him.
Remember this when you vote, folks: Downies want to make sure that the Boy Scouts are destroyed by their ACLU allies.
Maggots? Liberals would have to evolve to become maggots.
Senator Babs Bonehead (Dimwit-California) reacts to President Bush's selection of Judge John Roberts for the vacant seat on the US Supreme Court. Babs told a group of reporters, "Why would the President name that reporter guy from CBS News? I mean, he's cute and all, but for the Supreme Court? Isn't that reaching out to the media to end this Karl Rove story a bit too much?"
For any longtime Joobo reader, Tony Blair's standing by America, despite the political costs (especially for asshole English leftists who hate America), has been one reason why we have resisted calling his domestic program one of the worst in the civilized world. But what Tony Blair did today is really the end. He met with "the Muslim community" - in other words, the same scum which calls daily for the destruction of the West and the installation of an Islamic state with Shari'a law so that Muslims can control the world. This comes less than two weeks after these same Muslim scum helped to kill 50+ Britons on trains and a bus through their favorite pastime, blowing themselves up with bomb belts in crowded areas.
Taskforce to fight terror
The prime minister was speaking in the wake of a meeting with 25 senior Muslim leaders at Downing Street to discuss how best to respond to the July 7th attacks.
It had been a "very heartening meeting" which showed a "remarkable degree of unity" between the different representatives, Mr Blair said.
He said there was a "strong desire" from those who met to set up a taskforce to speak to young Muslims in the UK and defeat extremism.
While stressing that the vast majority of British Muslims condemned the violence in London, Mr Blair has said that the community must speak out against extremism. Today's meeting, he said, was intended to mobilise the moderate voice of Islam to fight extremism.
Conservative leader Michael Howard, who also attended the meeting along with Lib Dem leader Charles Kennedy, added: "One thing that came out most was the responsibility of the Muslim community for reaching out to those who have been the targets of the merchants of evil and hatred."
How about a listing of those "25 senior Muslim leaders"? I bet a check of them against radical speeches would show that most, if not all, were closer to bin Laden's way of thinking than Blair's.
However, Blair found a "remarkable degree of unity." Oh, yeah. Unity behind making sure we bow before that fat fucker Mohammed and his sick cultist followers.
Tony Blair and George W. Bush need to understand something: we are in a war against Islam. Whether or not they believe that or are too afraid to say it, that is how it is. And until the civilized world understands that until it crushes Islam under its boot, the same way it crushed Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan in the Second World War, the world will continue to hover in the shadow of mortal danger. It is only a matter of time before these Muslim psychopaths get their hands on a nuclear weapon - and then perhaps when 10 million die on one day will the message become clear as to what needs to be done.
Wednesday, July 20, 2005
Let's see...4 Muslim lowlifes bomb trains and a bus in London, they were trained in Pakistan, a Muslim country, and they did it because they are Muslims. So Ken Livingstone, the fairy mayor of London, blames who? Israel.
Livingstone: Likud is like Hamas
London Mayor Ken Livingstone, whose city was devastated by Islamic suicide bombings earlier in the month, lashed out at Israel Tuesday, comparing the Likud to Hamas and accusing Israel of "crimes against humanity."
At a London press conference, Livingstone, who has a long record of anti-Israeli diatribes, drew a connection between the London blasts and the Middle East. He said Israel had "done horrendous things which border on crimes against humanity in the way they have indiscriminately slaughtered men, women and children in the West Bank and Gaza for decades."
Livingstone expressed understanding for the motivations of Palestinian suicide bombers, saying that since the "Palestinians don't have jet fighters, they only have their bodies to use as weapons. In that unfair balance, that's what people use."
The question here is this: Why wasn't Livingstone on one of those trains when the bombs went off? Wouldn't that have been wonderful? How about if the next set of Muslim terrorists can all congregate right outside his office and as he comes out can greet him with "1,2,3,4...boom!"
Now THAT would be some Islamic terrorism that I would cheer.
Tuesday, July 19, 2005
Monday, July 18, 2005
"Joe Wilson misled the American public about who sent him to Niger, he misled the American public about what he found when he was there, he misled the American public about which documents he did or did not look at, he misled the American public about who at the White House or in the Administration may or may not have seen his documents. When asked to explain himself he said he sometimes used ‘literary flair.’ He then appeared in a big spread in Vanity Fair magazine. Talking about this he said I’m wondering who is going to play me in the TV movie. This is not somebody who has got a good record of being a source of accurate information." RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman, CNN’s "Late Edition," 17 July 2005
Sounds good to me.
If you listen to the MSM in the United States, you will conclude that 1) Karl Rove committed a crime; 2) Karl Rove committed treason; 3) Joe Wilson is the innocent victim of bad George W. Bush; and 4) the White House is covering up a crime, and this could be worse than Watergate.
Of course, not even one of those is true. Let's see why.
For those not in the know, this story started in 2003, right after the US went to war in Iraq. Leading up to the war's start, the British intelligence services discovered that Saddam Hussein was trying to buy what is called "yellowcake," or uranium-enriched powder, from mines in southern Africa. The British passed this on to us, and President Bush said so in his 2003 State of the Union (SOTU) speech:
President Delivers "State of the Union"
The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.
Notice that Bush never says "We have learned" or "We have found." He says that the British have learned such and such. Considering that the British stand behind the story to this day, this statement is not incorrect. But liberals continue to insinuate that Bush somehow lied. Pure bullshit, of course.
Following this, we discovered that former US Ambassador to Iraq Joseph C. Wilson IV went to Niger, one of the countries - one, not all of them - where the British dredged up this information. Little did anyone know at the time that Wilson, a former Republican appointee of President George H.W. Bush, was secretly working on the payroll of the Democrats, and would later work as a foreign policy consultant to John Kerry during his presidential campaign. Wilson may have been working for Kerry when he went to Niger - he and Kerry have never stated when Wilson came on board the Kerry Disaster of 2004. Wilson started a website, "Restorehonesty.com," which used to post ridiculous Wilsonian (Joseph, not Woodrow) conspiracies about Bush, WMD, and Iraq. Of course, for some reason which we can only guess at (paranoia?), John Kerry got embarrassed by Doofus Wilson and now anyone going to Wilson's site is re-directed to Kerry's site. And any search of Kerry's site shows no signs of the name Wilson, Joseph Wilson, or Ambassador Wilson. Interesting, eh?
Putting that aside, Wilson somehow got this plum position out of the blue - for a long time, no one could really say how Wilson, and not some other person, got the job. Considering that Wilson was not an expert on WMD issues, it is somewhat of a mystery. Wilson returned to the US after a few short weeks to announce that Bush had lied, Saddam was not trying to buy yellowcake, and all was well. It was later discovered that Wilson went to Niger, spent some time talking to government officials, spent a lot of time in fancy restuarants on the government's tab, and in the end made allegations which were proven wholly untrue.
The story then shifted to: Who sent Wilson to Niger? George Tenet, at the time Director of Central Intelligence, gave a statement that he had nothing to do with the appointment. What angered those at the White House was Wilson's insistence - he now claims otherwise - that Vice President Dick Cheney sent him to Niger. Evidence has been found that Cheney had no role whatsoever in Wilson's mission - and Wilson knew he was lying outright when he said that.
Finally, word leaked from the CIA that Wilson's wife - a Democrat named Valerie Plame - who had one time served as a covert operative but for the last 6+ years had been just an analyst at CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia, had "recommended" her husband to her bosses at the CIA - and they had sent him without doing any background investigation or to see if he had any political bent. So, Wilson goes, fluffs off the whole trip, comes back, and, to aid his possibly current and definitely future employer John Kerry reports that President Bush is a liar. So much for that.
Weeks later, the story continued to boil, but the central question, "Who sent Wilson to Niger?" had yet to be fully answered, especially to the Bush White House's satisfaction. Bring in Karl Rove, at that time Bush's political advisor and now deputy national security advisor. Downies hate Rove because he has made piles of shit out of them since 2000. Rove did some investigating, and discovered that Wilson's wife, Plame, had got him the assignment. So, enter Matthew Cooper, writer for Time Magazine. Cooper called Rove and asked about the story on the WMD and yellowcake intelligence. Rove, in an e-mail, cautioned Cooper not to go out on a limb over the story - that Wilson's wife had gotten him the job, from what Rove had heard from the CIA. Never did Rove say Plame's name, or intimate that she was anything but an analyst at Langley. Cooper then called around, and his inquiry landed on the desk of Robert Novak, the long-time Washington reporter, who made some calls on his own and discovered Plame's name. He then called Rove and told him Plame's name, and said that she was a CIA analyst. Rover told Novak, "Yeah, I've heard that too."
Novak then called the CIA and told them that he was writing an article that Valerie Plame, former covert agent and now analyst, was behind getting Wilson the appointment. Had Plame been in danger of being "outed," the CIA would surely have said something - but they told Novak no such thing. In fact, he called back, and again asked if it was okay to use her name. Again, he was not asked to avoid doing so.
When Novak's article was published, liberals and Bush-haters sprang to Wilson and his wife's defense - after all, they said with no proof, this was done by the Bush White House to destroy Wilson's credibility which, we find later, never existed at all. Bush asked his entire staff - including Rove - if they had leaked Plame's name. All said they had not - which was the absolute truth. But the Downies demanded a special counsel, after they had let the independent counsel act be voided because they did not want any more investigations of the (read:criminal) Clinton administration. Instead of doing the Clinton 1-2-3, and refusing to do anything, Bush asked then-Attorney General John Ashcroft to find a counsel. Pat Fitzgerald, who was the US Attorney for Chicago, was named to lead the investigation on 30 December 2003.
Fitzgerald's purview is to investigate whether a crime was committed. Now, the act which covers this kind of information is called the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982, located at 50 USC [United States Code] 421, et seq. The relevant portion of this law, drafted by, among others, Washington attorney and Republican Victoria Toensing, is located at 50 USC 421:
Protection of identities of certain United States undercover intelligence officers, agents, informants, and sources
(a) Disclosure of information by persons having or having had access to classified information that identifies covert agent. Whoever, having or having had authorized access to classified information that identifies a covert agent, intentionally discloses any information identifying such covert agent to any individual not authorized to receive classified information, knowing that the information disclosed so identifies such covert agent and that the United States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such covert agent's intelligence relationship to the United States, shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(b) Disclosure of information by persons who learn identity of covert agents as result of having access to classified information. Whoever, as a result of having authorized access to classified information, learns the identify of a covert agent and intentionally discloses any information identifying such covert agent to any individual not authorized to receive classified information, knowing that the information disclosed so identifies such covert agent and that the United States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such covert agent's intelligence relationship to the United States, shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
Notice the key words: covert agent. Hmm, you ask. Was Valerie Plame a "covert agent" as defined by this law? Well, the law specifically defines someone being a "covert agent" as someone who has been undercover within the five years before their cover was blown.
Well, despite liberals and Wilson and their mentally deficient supporters, Valerie Plame was not an agent for six years before Novak outed her - and the evidence shows this most convincingly:
Rove fight escalates
A former CIA covert agent who supervised Mrs. Plame early in her career yesterday took issue with her identification as an "undercover agent," saying that she worked for more than five years at the agency's headquarters in Langley and that most of her neighbors and friends knew that she was a CIA employee. "She made no bones about the fact that she was an agency employee and her husband was a diplomat," Fred Rustmann, a covert agent from 1966 to 1990, told The Washington Times.
"Her neighbors knew this, her friends knew this, his friends knew this. A lot of blame could be put on to central cover staff and the agency because they weren't minding the store here. ... The agency never changed her cover status."
Mr. Rustmann, who spent 20 of his 24 years in the agency under "nonofficial cover" -- also known as a NOC, the same status as the wife of Mr. Wilson -- also said that she worked under extremely light cover.
In addition, Mrs. Plame hadn't been out as an NOC since 1997, when she returned from her last assignment, married Mr. Wilson and had twins, USA Today reported yesterday.
The distinction matters because a law that forbids disclosing the name of undercover CIA operatives applies to agents that had been on overseas assignment "within the last five years."
"She was home for such a long time, she went to work every day at Langley, she was in an analytical type job, she was married to a high-profile diplomat with two kids," Mr. Rustmann said. "Most people who knew Valerie and her husband, I think, would have thought that she was an overt CIA employee."
So, according to the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982, Rove could not have admitted a crime, because he did not out a "covert agent," as well as the fact that he never used her name. Robert Novak did - not Rove. And he could not have committed a crime, because Plame was NOT a "covert agent" as the law describes it.
Despite what we know now, at the time this story first exploded Wilson and his wife and his liberal defenders continued to insist that Plame was a covert agent - yet never offered any evidence of it. And then, after two years of claiming otherwise, Joseph Wilson made a shocking - and potentially damaging - revelation, one which the media continues to ignore: He said that his wife was not a "clandestine agent" at the time of the alleged leak:
CNN WOLF BLITZER REPORTS
BLITZER: But the other argument that's been made against you is that you've sought to capitalize on this extravaganza, having that photo shoot with your wife, who was a clandestine officer of the CIA, and that you've tried to enrich yourself writing this book and all of that.
What do you make of those accusations, which are serious accusations, as you know, that have been leveled against you?
WILSON: My wife was not a clandestine officer the day that Bob Novak blew her identity.
BLITZER: But she hadn't been a clandestine officer for some time before that?
WILSON: That's not anything that I can talk about. And, indeed, I'll go back to what I said earlier, the CIA believed that a possible crime had been committed, and that's why they referred it to the Justice Department.
She was not a clandestine officer at the time that that article in "Vanity Fair" appeared.
So, Wilson admits Plame was not a "covert agent." As they say in tennis: game, set, match. There can be no crime because the strictures of the law covering the crime have not been met.
Fast forward to now: We all watch as "reporters" (we should call them "alleged reporters") harass the White House to admit a crime has been committed - or they tell their dimwitted and unknowing audiences that a crime has definitely been committed. Downies head to microphones to demand Karl Rove's resignation, or that his national security clearance be pulled. Seeing how the White House media is reacting to this kind of bullshit story, you would think that their bosses back at the office would be backing them up - giving them a "Hey, yeah, we got another Watergate! Keep investigating!" But no! Instead, they send liberal reporters to salivate over a story with no legs, and then tell a court the opposite - that no crime was committed in the "Plame Affair" and that the whole thing is, well, bullshit:
In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller, No. 04-3138; In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Matthew Cooper, No. 04-3139
"In this case, there exists ample evidence on the public record to cast serious doubts as to whether a crime has been committed under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act (the "Act") in the investigation underlying the attempts to secure testimony from Miller and Cooper."
Who is behind this amicus curae ("friend of the court") brief? No less than ABC, FoxNews, Reuters, Bloomberg, the AP, CNN, CBS News, Cox Newspapers, and the Washington Post - just to name a few. Check out the whole filing - and read the utter hypocrisy of the whole situation.
So, to sum up this sorry story: Joseph Wilson IV lied to get his cushy assignment to Niger, he lied about what he saw there, Karl Rove never used his wife's name or that she had been a CIA operative, and the facts show that and nothing more.
The MSM's response? More bullshit, more lies, and the attempted reinstatement of Joseph Wilson, a proven liar.
It is no wonder that as this nation is in a death grip with Islamic terrorism world-wide, the American media is focused on whether Karl Rove should be fired.
Pathetic. Simply pathetic.
Sunday, July 17, 2005
Here is just one reason - after all, he is a Downie, which means that he is an asshole all the time.
Soldier survives attack; captures, medically treats sniper
During a routine patrol in Baghdad June 2, Army Pfc. Stephen Tschiderer, a medic, was shot in the chest by an enemy sniper, hiding in a van just 75 yards away. The incident was filmed by the insurgents.
Tschiderer, with E Troop, 101st “Saber” Cavalry Division, attached to 3rd Battalion, 156th Infantry Regiment, 256th Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division, was knocked to the ground from the impact, but he popped right back up, took cover and located the enemy’s position.
After tracking down the now-wounded sniper with a team from B Company, 4th Battalion, 1st Iraqi Army Brigade, Tschiderer secured the terrorist with a pair of handcuffs and gave medical aid to the terrorist who’d tried to kill him just minutes before.
The site has video of the incident - taken by the terrorist scum so they could air it on one of their sick Muslim websites, or maybe have sick fucking Islamic scumbags at al-Jazeera air it.
So, going back to our original argument: This is the kind of people that Dick Durbin compared to Nazis and Soviet stormtroopers.
Fuck Dick Durbin. Wait: let me repeat that.
FUCK DICK DURBIN.
Saturday, July 16, 2005
British journalist Stephen Pollard writes in The Daily Mail of London that the BBC is now wholly on the side of the Islamic terrorists - and against the West and innocent people.
So whose side is the BBC on?
For years, the BBC has been infected by a left-liberal bias. Its reporting, for example, of the arguments over the future of the EU has made out that those in favour of ever-greater European integration are peace loving sages, as opposed to those who believe in self-government who are, by definition, xenophobic bigots.
That bias, real as it is, has often been subtle. Let the BBC’s reports wash over you without paying full critical attention and you might not even notice it.
But the distorted way in which the BBC has reported the terrorist murders in London is of a different order of magnitude altogether.
In the immediate moments after the murders, it seemed as if something might have changed for the better. The murderers were, rightly, described by BBC reporters as terrorists. The BBC’s website had a page with the headline, “Bus man may have seen terrorist”. The story began, “A bus passenger says he may have seen one of those responsible for the terrorist bomb attacks in London.” Another page referred to “the worst terrorist atrocity Britain has seen.”
The use of the word terrorist was surprising, but welcome. Surprising, because in its coverage of terrorism in Israel, the BBC has consistently described the suicide murderers who blow up buses, with the specific intent of murdering as many Israelis as possible, as ‘extremists’ or ‘militants’. The word terrorist never passes correspondents’ lips.
So to see the BBC describe Thursday’s murderers as terrorists looked like a rare example of the corporation using accurate descriptions of terrorists.
It did not last long. By Friday, those web pages had been edited to excise all references to terrorism. The first page had a new headline: “Passenger believes he saw bomber”. The story was changed to: “A bus passenger says he may have seen one of those responsible for the bomb attacks in London.” And the second story now read: “the worst peacetime bomb attacks Britain has seen.”
No mention of terrorism was anywhere to be seen.
But for all the warped values which led to such changes, the edits merely affected the BBC’s own words. What the corporation did to the Prime Minister’s words in the House of Commons on Monday, however, was simply shocking.
Mr Blair told MPs this: “It seems probable that the attack was carried out by Islamist extremist terrorists…” The BBC’s report of Mr Blair’s statement is a wilful distortion: “Those responsible…, probably Islamic extremists, would be hunted down.” The Prime Minister referred to them specifically as terrorists. But the BBC deliberately left out that most important word.
And it did not even report Mr Blair’s conclusion: “Together, we will ensure that though terrorists can kill, they will never destroy the way of life we share and which we value, and which we will defend with the strength of belief and conviction so that it is to us and not to the terrorists, that victory will belong.”
There were, presumably, simply too many references to terrorists for the BBC to concoct even a distorted report.
In the BBC mindset, the murderers are not terrorists. As its Editorial Guidelines puts it: “Our credibility is undermined by the careless use of words which carry emotional or value judgements. The word ‘terrorist’ itself can be a barrier rather than an aid to understanding.”
The bombers, as the BBC insists they be called, merely have a different world view from the rest of us, you see. Indeed, the guidelines say, “we recognise our duty to protect the vulnerable and avoid unjustified offence or likely harm. We aim to achieve this by ensuring our output is not used to denigrate the beliefs of others.” How awful it would be if mass murdering Islamists were offended or denigrated by being called terrorists.
But terrorism is not a value judgement. It is recognised as a crime against humanity under international law. Professor Norman Geras defines it as “the deliberate targeting of civilians with a view to killing and maiming them and if possible in large numbers”. To describe Thursday’s bombers as terrorists is merely to observe the reality of human rights law.
This is, of course, about far more than labels. The refusal to use the word terrorist goes to the heart of the BBC’s world view, in which such murders are simply a response to the West’s provocation.
It is all our fault, according to the BBC’s ‘experts’. On Friday night, a Newsnight correspondent, Peter Marshall, informed us that “What the war on terror was supposed to prevent, it has brought about.”
That is the least of it. Frank Gardner, the BBC’s Security Correspondent, has been lauded for his return to work after being shot by terrorists – oh, excuse me, militants - in Saudi Arabia. His undoubted bravery ought, however, not to prevent his analysis of Thursday’s events from being exposed for what it is.
Speaking on Radio 4 on Monday, Mr Gardner declared that Western policies in Muslim countries, and ‘harassment’ of suspected Islamists in Britain and Europe, was ‘offensive’ to Wahabis. But what Wahabis find offensive is the very existence of the West, which they are committed to destroying.
He then remarked that that it was extraordinary that they planted a bomb in Edgware Road, since this was a Muslim area. Yet not only did they not plant a bomb there (it went off in a moving train), they have as long a track record of murdering Muslims as they do of killing apostates.
Mr Gardner concluded that it was “doubly tough for Britain’s Muslims…it’s more of a blow for them than for everyone else”. Really? The relatives and friends of the victims might disagree with that.
There is much, much more of this sort of thing – not least the ludicrous BBC series, The Power of Nightmares, broadcast at prime time, which sought to prove that, in the words of its producer, the threat of global terrorism, “is a fantasy that has been exaggerated and distorted by politicians. It is a dark illusion that has spread unquestioned through governments around the world, the security services, and the international media”.
Last Thursday did not happen, it would seem. It was all an illusion.
If the BBC was just another broadcaster, forced to compete for an audience, we could choose whether or not to support it. Instead, each of us is forced, under threat of imprisonment, to pay for it to broadcast its distortions of the threat we face. We have had to put up with this bias for too long. It is time the BBC was held to account for its behaviour.
Friday, July 15, 2005
When the BBC admits there is a problem afoot with liberalism in society, it is better than if Hitler admitted his favorite people really were Jews. So for the BBC to now say that (ahem) that “multiculturalism,” that liberal experiment to allow every slug from around the world into one’s country and to somehow “benefit” from their "distinct and different" cultures, has utterly failed, it is an incredible moment in the seeing liberals see their whole program drop dead right before their eyes.
UK multi-culturalism under spotlight
The radicalisation of some younger members of Britain's 1.5 million-strong Muslim community has led to often heated debate. Now questions are being asked about whether British-style multi-culturalism is succeeding or failing.
Of course, this comes from a BBC analyst, but for the BBC to post this anywhere on their site without whitewashing it is an amazing turn of events. Let’s hope it continues – but let no one hold their breath.
Thursday, July 14, 2005
My god of Gods - here is what people call "abuse" of terrorists imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba:
Guantanamo inmate forced to wear bra, act like a dog: report
A suspected terrorist was forced to wear a bra, dance with another man and behave like a dog during his interrogation at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, military investigators said Wednesday.
They are kidding, right? This is abuse?
Then again, liberals consider this kind of treatment as a right and celebrate it:
So what's the big fucking deal?
Why, oh, why, do Downies have nothing positive to say, ever? Why, instead of holding worthless press conferences where they lay out a national strategy to, for instance, try to get thiss country's Social Security situation straightened out. or to help this nation attain energy independence, do they waste their time on trying to bring down Karl Rove? Why, instead, do Downies spend their days and nights thinking up new ways to make themselves more arrogant and more annoying than usual?
In the wake of the Karl Rove brouhaha, Downies have decided that they can use the kerfluffle in a whole new and incredibly exciting way to make the lives of people more miserable. John Kerry, rich liberal fucker that he is, out to tax the shit out of everyone who hasn't stolen as much moolah as he has, holds a press conference, where he angrily demands that Karl Rove resign. (And then he writes us a lovely letter asking same - more on that later.) Howard "Aaarrrgghhh!" Dean says Rove should resign. Hillary Clinton says Karl Rove should resign. And where is the ass-kissing liberal media? They are paying attention to these three idjits, asking them, "Yeah! You DO think Rove should resign, don't you? What courage!"
The Downies have no shame - they never have - but being in the Incredibly Shrinking Minority and being worthless slugs have only added to their shamelessness. That they oppose Karl Rove, who helped to beat them like a drum since 2000, is not surprising. That the media has their tongues up Downie ass is also not much of a surprise. But to see the media throw its lot in with the powerless Downies in an attempt to bring down anyone, anything related to President Bush, is just one more piece of evidence that the leftwing media in this country is wholly out of control and needs to be reigned in.
Tuesday, July 12, 2005
That Muslims are the focus of violence and evil in this world is no surprise - any society which has Muslims in it can expect radicalization and then unrestrained terrorism from these bottom-dwellers called Muslims. But Euro-Peons are just far too stupid to realize the danger in their midst: when the murderer of Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh admitted in court that he committed the crime, and would do it again in the name of Islam, court watchers were shocked. Shocked!
Muslim radical confesses to Van Gogh killing in court tirade
The self-confessed killer of Theo van Gogh faced the victim’s mother in an Amsterdam court today and told her he felt no remorse for his crime.
Turning his chair towards Anneke van Gogh as she watched from the public gallery, the Moroccan-born Mohammed Bouyeri said: “I don’t feel your pain. I don’t have any sympathy for you. I can’t feel for you because I think you’re a non-believer.”
The Islamic radical admitted killing Mr Van Gogh, a Dutch film maker, saying he was driven by his religious beliefs, and claimed he would do the same again.
Mr Bouyeri, the son of Moroccan immigrants to the Netherlands, is accused of shooting and stabbing van Gogh to death in broad daylight in the streets of Amsterdam in November, before nearly decapitating him and impaling a five-page note declaring holy war into his corpse with a knife.
Despite insisting on his right to silence when the trial opened yesterday, Mr Bouyeri spoke out publicly today for the first time about the murder which sparked a wave of ethnic and religious violence across the once-tolerant country.
Clutching a Koran, and wearing a flowing robe and a black and white chequered headscarf, Mr Bouyeri praised Allah and the prophet Mohammed before admitting the killing.
In a chilling insight into his mindset, he told the panel of judges: "I did what I did purely out of my beliefs. I want you to know that I acted out of conviction and not that I took his life because he was Dutch or because I was Moroccan and felt insulted."
Seven months before his ritualistic slaughter, van Gogh had produced a film about domestic violence in Islam, which offended many Muslims. Mr Bouyeri insisted: "If I ever get free, I would do it again."
He was caught by police in a gun battle after he fled the scene of the crime spattered in van Gogh’s blood. A note was found in his pocket saying that he wanted to become a martyr.
Speaking in Dutch with a Moroccan accent, he turned to police in the court and said: "I shot to kill and be killed. You cannot understand."
Some spectators rose to their feet, visibly stunned by his comments. The confession and lack of remorse highlight the worst fears haunting the mainstream Dutch society about the seemingly unbridgeable gap between them and some of the alienated Muslim youths growing up in the country.
When people around the world - and even here in America - come to the firm realization that having any Muslims in your society is the first step in the destruction of the world, we will all be better off. Until that day, however, shit like this will continue to happen. And it is only going to get worse.
If you are a regular Joobo reader, you know that the BBC, the British Broadcasting Corporation, is one of the three pillars of journalistic evil, along with CNN and al-Jazeera. These "networks" use the airwaves to sing the song of the Islamic terrorist at the same time they criticize the US, President George W. Bush, and Israel. If something bad about any of these can be aired, they do it.
Now comes word that documents released to the British newspaper The Daily Telegraph show that BBC reporters have been ordered to avoid calling those who bombed London last week "terrorists."
BBC edits out the word terrorist
The BBC has re-edited some of its coverage of the London Underground and bus bombings to avoid labelling the perpetrators as "terrorists", it was disclosed yesterday.
Early reporting of the attacks on the BBC's website spoke of terrorists but the same coverage was changed to describe the attackers simply as "bombers".
The BBC's guidelines state that its credibility is undermined by the "careless use of words which carry emotional or value judgments".
Consequently, "the word 'terrorist' itself can be a barrier rather than an aid to understanding" and its use should be "avoided", the guidelines say.
Rod Liddle, a former editor of the Today programme, has accused the BBC of "institutionalised political correctness" in its coverage of British Muslims.
A BBC spokesman said last night: "The word terrorist is not banned from the BBC."
We have noted that BBC thuggee John Simpson has said that the bombers are just "poor misguided people." This is why the BBC presents a daily drumbeat against the war in Iraq and the holding of terrorists at Guantanamo Bay.
To the BBC and other leftist scum, these murderers are not terrorists, and damn anyone who says so. And just ignore those 50 or so dead bodies lying in buses and trains from the good works of these "poor misguided people."
This kind of thinking is sickening. Simply sickening.
Monday, July 11, 2005
Liberals have a problem: they believe (in their heart of hearts) that the murderers of 9/11, Madrid, Beirut, Tel Aviv (actually, they support those who attack Israel, so scratch that), and now London are not terrorists, not Islamic thugs, not murderers. No! They believe that they are just poor misguided people who, with a little talking to, would come around and be peaceful as...say, Mother Teresa.
Don't believe me? Check out Grand Master Asshole John Simpson of the BBC, who have started to let that "the London bombers are NOT terrorists, damn it!" feeling get into their coverage:
London bombs need calm response
Now that the bombs have exploded, and thousands of newspaper pages and entire days of air time have been devoted to the horror of it all, and to the poor, decent people who are dead and missing, and to the misguided criminals responsible, perhaps we can stand back from it all and catch our breath.
Whew - and here I thought we should go out and kill these Islamic vermin.
So, what does Simpson recommend?
Countering political violence isn't easy. It takes rigid self-discipline on the part of government and people. And it takes a degree of proportion and self-awareness too. Thursday was a terrible day for London; yet we mustn't forget that much the same number of people died that day in Iraq, and no one dedicated acres of newsprint to them.
We must hunt the bombers down, because they have committed a vicious crime against society. But we mustn't throw away the calm and self-possession which every decent society needs. It's not weakness; it's our greatest strength.
Here's what I say we should do: Someone should tie a rope around Mr. Simpson, leave him somewhere in a public place in London, and everyone who wishes can come up and throw rocks at him until he is a bloody mass.
And then they should piss on his dead corpse.
Now THAT is what should be done to those liberals who advocate making "nice" with terrorists.
Sunday, July 10, 2005
Saturday, July 09, 2005
Well, here we go again: disgusting fucking liberals disguised as human beings are saying it out loud: England deserved the train bombings...it is all Tony Blair's fault, and George W. Bush's fault, and America's fault.
Yep - if you are a disturbed fucking liberal, then these comments from your fellow DNA-less cretins at DUmmies Underground come as no surprise. But, if you are someone who wants to fight Islamic terror, this is the face of the enemy's friends amongst us:
London Blast Thread #3 - 40 reported dead in London blasts
But it is beacuse of our WAR CRIMES that they did it. Stupid illegal war.
Yes, Blair, "barbaric," just like the daisy-cutter bombs you and yours dropped on innocent people in Iraq. As Richard Clark had predicted, your preemptive attack on Iraq--and your little buddy's, the Chimp--has brought more terror on the world, not less. Wake the hell up. You brought this on all of us.
blair and chimp will never admit even to themselves that this is another direct cause of their bombing Iraq.
Fuck you very much guys for pursuing agendas that line your pockets and endanger the masses.
"Those" responsible have no respect for human life...blair and chimp think they've got the masses back into terror, and fear... bad. This is sad. And this is bad. I'm speechless.
Just woke up to this news. I want to express that my thoughts and prayers are with my fellow humans in London. I am so very sorry our criminal president has dragged you into this. (If it does indeed turn out to be AQ-related)
It's High Time to End ALL Violence And bring back "DIPLOMACY!" Like sitting down w/those we do not agree wit, nor understand and say "Let's talk." Screw the powers that are (no longer to be - they are already at that pivotal level). How about "HOLDING HANDS" not just across American to re-unite our nation that's divided by Hur Bullshi$ and bLAIR but to show solidarity for all humanity accross the globe. Anyone notice what that one report said - Trying to "divide" Brits now too. WTF? Just like here, maybe?
Notice that most of these thugs cannot spell even simple words correctly?
But now we hear that we need to "hold hands" with terrorists so we can "understand" them.
Marxist bullshit Julius Rosenberg-style liberal education at its finest.
Is it any wonder that countries that elect liberals see their standards (education, economy, security, values) go downhill? Reading the thoughts of these freaks, one can see why.