Friday, June 15, 2007
In 2006, when the Republican-led Congress pushed every earmark, or personal pet project, into budgets, the media had a field day - every Republican was called corrupt. Aand then Nancy Pelosi (D-Nutjob) said that if the Downies took control of Congress, they would "do away" with earmarks.
Alas, alack! Downies win control! And what, pray tell, happened? Earmarks increased! And Downies took offense at any suggestion that they should act on their promise and do away with them! And the media, which excoriated Republicans, yawned and covered more important stories, like making sure Paris Hilton went to prison!
And this week, the Downies went one step further: they said that their earmarks would not even be debated on - in fact, they would stuff them into budget and other bills at the END of the debate, when the bill is ready to go to the White House for the President's signature!
Republicans in the House revolted, and made the Downies back down. News? Of course. In the liberal media? Of course not.
House Republicans claim victory in earmark reform showdown
House Republicans banded together this week to force Democrats to restore GOP earmark reforms that brought real transparency and accountability to the budget process.
Faced with a united Republican Conference, the Democratic leadership backed down on their plan to hide earmarks in a series of multi-billion dollar slush funds and, effective immediately, agreed to allow Republicans to challenge wasteful spending in appropriations bills on the House floor.
As part of the deal completed after extensive negotiations that ended late today, Republicans agreed to allow two appropriations bills (Homeland Security and Military Quality of Life) – bills that include few or no earmarks – to move forward immediately. All 10 remaining appropriations bills will come to the floor later with their earmarks fully disclosed and subject to challenge by any lawmaker – a key element of the 2006 GOP reforms.
The issue of transparency and accountability in government spending has been at the forefront of congressional action all year. In January the majority approved a conveniently-flawed rules package that made it harder than ever to identify earmarks tucked quietly into spending bills and all but impossible to remove them.
The rules allowed the majority to declare legislation loaded with millions of dollars in earmarks as "earmark free" – a process exploited by Rep. John Murtha, D-PA, to secure passage of an illegitimate taxpayer-funded earmark in a bill meant to fund our intelligence activities, over the vehement objections of House Republicans.
As time wore on, the majority abandoned any pretense of fiscal responsibility and purposely wasted time on veto-bait legislation that never had any chance of becoming law. Rather than getting the appropriations process moving, they focused all of their energies on undermining our troops.
Then came a decision by Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey, D-WI, to not only make all earmarks secret, but to replace them in Democratic spending bills with multi-billion dollar slush funds – blank spots to be filled in at a later date, all hidden from serious public scrutiny.
The liberal media has not had one word to say against Obey, or Murtha, or Pelosi. That Republicans, in the minority, forced them to back down, is quite a story, one that liberals would have covered had they done it.