Joobo stands for reason, morality, and honesty...and against leftist perversion and dishonesty. Join us as we expose the left for its hatred of everything that is good and its support of everything that is evil.

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

Karl Rove NOT Indicted for Phony Plame Story; The Left Goes Apeshit

For months, the American Left has been predicting that Presidential advisor Karl Rove would be indicted for some crime in the Valerie Plame CIA leak case - perjury, or the leak itself, or, as the left said with no authority, some crime...because Joe Wilson, Valerie Plame's husband, wanted Rove "frog marched" out of the White House in handcuffs. Well, this week the shock of shocks occurred when Rove's lawyer was notified by Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald that Rove would NOT be indicted.

The Left has gone apeshit - and showed what moral degenerates they truly are.

Here is but a round-up of their silliness.

Over at Daily Kos, the far far left website where liberals like to make shit up and stay delusional, we have two wonderful reasons why liberals should never be in power in this country, ever again:

My Take on the Rove Announcement

My logic is this:

Dick Cheney is dragging down the White House. He is largely responsible for the mess in Iraq. He is trying to sabotage any attempts to negotiate honestly with Iran. And he is exposing everyone in the Administration to some serious legal jeopardy, in the event they ever lose control of courts. At some point, Dick Cheney's authoritarianism will doom Bush's legacy.

But you can't make him quit. His is a Constitutional office, he was elected along with Bush, so you can't make him resign like you can with your Treasury Secretary or your Environmental Secretary. What better way to get rid of him, then, than to expose him to legal proceedings? It gives you the ability (farcical, but no matter) to say that you have severed all ties with his policies and legacies.


Good logic: Rove was not indicted so that he could aid in indicting VP Dick Cheney. And Bush wants this so he can "get rid" of Cheney.

And this comes from the enemies of Bush and Cheney. Definitely top flight sources, of course.

But, so we can continue to entertain, some more from the assorted nuts and loons at Daily Kos:

Intent to deceive can be inferred

It doesn't have to be all laid out like stepping stones across a pond.

One or two stones can be missing, and people can still make an intuitive leap to the next stone.

Hell, many people have been executed in this country on circumstantial evidence much more flimsy than what Fitzgerald has to work with.

It's a triumph of a nit-picking, fact-obsessed mentality that refuses to make any intuitive leaps or take any risks.

Every last "T" has to be crossed and "I" dotted, or it's no go.

Justice loses, and as Dean said, so does America.


Understand this? In short, this psycho believes that if Fitzgerald thought Rove is guilty, then he should have been indicted. No proof beyond a reasonable doubt, no proof at all - just a feeling, a surmise, and a belief.

The new liberal standard...unless it happens when one Bill Clinton lies to a grand jury.

But, let's not get ahead of ourselves here. After all, one loonytune liberal site reported a month ago - in an alleged exclusive - that Rove had already been indicted and that the indictment was sealed.

Wait - you heard right. An alleged news site reporting something a month ago that was this week proven to be made up out of whole cloth.

Karl Rove Indicted on Charges of Perjury, Lying to Investigators

Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald spent more than half a day Friday at the offices of Patton Boggs, the law firm representing Karl Rove.

During the course of that meeting, Fitzgerald served attorneys for former Deputy White House Chief of Staff Karl Rove with an indictment charging the embattled White House official with perjury and lying to investigators related to his role in the CIA leak case, and instructed one of the attorneys to tell Rove that he has 24 business hours to get his affairs in order, high level sources with direct knowledge of the meeting said Saturday morning.

Robert Luskin, Rove's attorney, did not return a call for comment. Sources said Fitzgerald was in Washington, DC, Friday and met with Luskin for about 15 hours to go over the charges against Rove, which include perjury and lying to investigators about how and when Rove discovered that Valerie Plame Wilson was a covert CIA operative and whether he shared that information with reporters, sources with direct knowledge of the meeting said.


Of course, the news that Rove was not indicted renders this story as pure horseshit, right? A retraction is coming, right?

Not so fast, pardner.

What's coming is...hold on for the laughter...that Rove WAS indicted, but that the indictment is sealed pending something.

What, the moron who wrote this refuses to say.

Sealed vs. Sealed

Four weeks ago, during the time when we reported that White House political adviser Karl Rove was indicted for crimes related to his role in the leak of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson, the grand jury empanelled in the case returned an indictment that was filed under seal in US District Court for the District of Columbia under the curious heading of Sealed vs. Sealed.

As of Friday afternoon that indictment, returned by the grand jury the week of May 10th, remains under seal - more than a month after it was handed up by the grand jury.

The case number is "06 cr 128." On the federal court's electronic database, "06 cr 128" is listed along with a succinct summary: "No further information is available."

We have not seen the contents of the indictment "06 cr 128". But the fact that this indictment was returned by the grand jury hearing evidence in the CIA leak case on a day that Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald met with the grand jury raised a number of questions about the identity of the defendant named in the indictment, whether it relates to the leak case, and why it has been under seal for a month under the heading Sealed vs. Sealed.


Yep, it's that old "sealed vs. unsealed" canard that lawyers like to play all the time.

Actually, what needs to happen is that the Left get back on their meds - and fast.

Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?