Tuesday, March 21, 2006
Liberals Continue to Defend Wuss Feingold
The liberals, who have thrown reason away with their sanity, are now in a mad dash to see how much support they can get for either censuring or impeaching President Bush. Wuss Feingold (D-Psycho) is at the head of this movement, a movement which needs to be lanced like a month-old boil.
Now, "Factcheck.org" says that an RNC ad claiming that Feingold wants to end the surveillance of al Qaeda suspects is "mischaracterizing" Feindork's stand.
Hmmm...you think?
RNC Mischaracterizes Feingold's Censure Resolution
Now, let's see:
President Bush wants to wiretap alleged al Qaeda suspects in the United States making calls to their terrorist buddies overseas. Feinschmuck wants to censure or impeach him for doing so. Now, if he says that the surveillance is wrong, obviously he wants to end it. So, how can an ad saying that he is against such surveillance be "mischaracterizing" his stand?
Of course, in Liberaldelusionland, such half-truths and stories which make no sense are the norm, not the exception.
The liberals, who have thrown reason away with their sanity, are now in a mad dash to see how much support they can get for either censuring or impeaching President Bush. Wuss Feingold (D-Psycho) is at the head of this movement, a movement which needs to be lanced like a month-old boil.
Now, "Factcheck.org" says that an RNC ad claiming that Feingold wants to end the surveillance of al Qaeda suspects is "mischaracterizing" Feindork's stand.
Hmmm...you think?
RNC Mischaracterizes Feingold's Censure Resolution
A GOP radio ad accuses Democratic Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin of proposing to censure President Bush "for pursuing suspected members of al Qaeda," which isn't true. Feingold has stated he supports wiretapping suspected terrorists. His measure would censure Bush for ordering wiretaps on US soil without a court warrant, for failing to notify all members of the Senate and House intelligence committees, and for "efforts to mislead the American people" about the legality of the program.
Now, let's see:
President Bush wants to wiretap alleged al Qaeda suspects in the United States making calls to their terrorist buddies overseas. Feinschmuck wants to censure or impeach him for doing so. Now, if he says that the surveillance is wrong, obviously he wants to end it. So, how can an ad saying that he is against such surveillance be "mischaracterizing" his stand?
Of course, in Liberaldelusionland, such half-truths and stories which make no sense are the norm, not the exception.
