Monday, February 20, 2006
BBC Admits Story About Tories "Not Impartial"
The BBC, part of the Axis of Journalistic Evil which perpetrates the worst kind of leftist bullcrap and slander, has admitted that one of their stories (one?) was "impartial" towards the Conservative Party during last year's election.
How nice - this only took a year to happen. A year after the election is over.
BBC news report 'not impartial'
And, unless you miss it, the story tells us quite happily that the thug who was behind this lie "is now the BBC's North American correspondent."
He must be working hand-in-hand with David "French" Gregory of NBC.
Now, why is Guto Harri not being fired, or at least recalled? Why is he still working?
The BBC, part of the Axis of Journalistic Evil which perpetrates the worst kind of leftist bullcrap and slander, has admitted that one of their stories (one?) was "impartial" towards the Conservative Party during last year's election.
How nice - this only took a year to happen. A year after the election is over.
BBC news report 'not impartial'
BBC rules on impartiality were broken during a report on the Ten O'Clock News, the corporation's governors said.
The complaint surrounded Guto Harri's report about the night's edition of Question Time, a month before the General Election last year.
Governors said rules were broken when Harri said the then Conservative leader was booed, but did not mention the same thing had happened to Tony Blair.
The omission breached BBC guidelines on accuracy and impartiality, they ruled.
And, unless you miss it, the story tells us quite happily that the thug who was behind this lie "is now the BBC's North American correspondent."
He must be working hand-in-hand with David "French" Gregory of NBC.
Now, why is Guto Harri not being fired, or at least recalled? Why is he still working?
