Saturday, January 21, 2006
Liberals: Bin Laden Tape is "Big Blow" to Bush
In liberalfantasyworld, good is bad, earth is sky, and Muslims are not dangerous.
If history reminds us, every time Osama bin Laden opens his mouth, it reminds Americans why we are at war, and why liberals cannot be trusted with America's security. For instance, just days before the 2004 election, as John Kerry began a small surge in the polls, bin Laden released one of his hilarious video tapes - and, as many Downies admit, the tape killed Kerry's momentum and sealed Bush's election chances.
Seeing this example, how hard can it be to fathom that bin Laden helps Bush, and does not hurt him?
For liberals, quite hard. The dolts at Newsday in New York (another leftist rag in the style of The New York Times) believe that the latest crap from bin Laden hurts President Bush...despite the fact that they can find not one fellow dolt to confirm their suspicions.
Liberals and intelligence: the two shall never meet.
Tape a 'big blow' to Bush
So, where in the story does one intel analyst, historian, writer, politician, or something else say that this new tape "hurts" President Bush?
Wait - we have Rep. Peter King, a Republican, who does say, "Just because he's talking about there being an attack in and of itself means nothing," King said. He believes bin Laden released the tape to rally supporters after an air strike in Pakistan, which is believed to have taken out several al-Qaida leaders."
So, where in that did King say the tape "hurts" President Bush?
The story should be titled, "Tape Could Be a Blow to Bush," and even then it would a stretch. But to say the tape IS a "blow" to President Bush is liberal fantasy. Which is how most of them lead their lives.
In liberalfantasyworld, good is bad, earth is sky, and Muslims are not dangerous.
If history reminds us, every time Osama bin Laden opens his mouth, it reminds Americans why we are at war, and why liberals cannot be trusted with America's security. For instance, just days before the 2004 election, as John Kerry began a small surge in the polls, bin Laden released one of his hilarious video tapes - and, as many Downies admit, the tape killed Kerry's momentum and sealed Bush's election chances.
Seeing this example, how hard can it be to fathom that bin Laden helps Bush, and does not hurt him?
For liberals, quite hard. The dolts at Newsday in New York (another leftist rag in the style of The New York Times) believe that the latest crap from bin Laden hurts President Bush...despite the fact that they can find not one fellow dolt to confirm their suspicions.
Liberals and intelligence: the two shall never meet.
Tape a 'big blow' to Bush
WASHINGTON -- The White House said a new audiotape shows Osama bin Laden is "on the run," but counterterrorism experts said it instead pointed up an embarrassing fact for President George W. Bush: It appears bin Laden is alive and well four years after Sept. 11.
More than that, some counterterror analysts pointed to parallels in a 2004 bin Laden tape where he offered a similar "truce" to European leaders, only to have the London subway bombings take place about a year later.
U.S. officials said yesterday that they had picked up no increased "chatter" signaling an imminent attack inside the United States, despite bin Laden's threat that a strike is in the works.
The Department of Homeland Security said it has no plans to raise the national terror alert level of yellow, the middle step of five.
The CIA confirmed the voice is bin Laden's and believes the audiotape was made recently, a senior administration official said. The al-Qaida leader refers to Bush's alleged desire to bomb Al-Jazeera television, first reported on Nov. 22.
So, where in the story does one intel analyst, historian, writer, politician, or something else say that this new tape "hurts" President Bush?
Wait - we have Rep. Peter King, a Republican, who does say, "Just because he's talking about there being an attack in and of itself means nothing," King said. He believes bin Laden released the tape to rally supporters after an air strike in Pakistan, which is believed to have taken out several al-Qaida leaders."
So, where in that did King say the tape "hurts" President Bush?
The story should be titled, "Tape Could Be a Blow to Bush," and even then it would a stretch. But to say the tape IS a "blow" to President Bush is liberal fantasy. Which is how most of them lead their lives.
